ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Impact of Ultrasound in Obstetric Anesthesia Central Blocks

E

Ege University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Anesthesia

Treatments

Other: The use of ultrasound in central blocks

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06761222
22-6.2/4

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultrasound in obstetric anesthesia, specifically for measuring epidural and intrathecal distances in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. The relationship between skin-subdural distance (Ultrasound depth) and needle depth was assessed, and the accuracy of ultrasound in determining needle entry site, needle distance, trial attempts, and block success was examined. Additionally, complications such as paresthesia, lower back pain, and postoperative headache were queried and recorded.

Full description

Obstetric anesthesia generally posed low risks; however, the difficulty of the procedure and the potential complications increased due to the anatomical and physiological changes associated with pregnancy.

The aim of study was to measure epidural and intrathecal distances in pregnant women undergoing cesarean sections and to evaluate the relationship between the skin-subdural distance (Ultrasound depth) and needle depth. The investigator assessed the accuracy of Ultrasound in determining the needle entry site, needle distance (measured at the site where cerebrospinal fluid flow occurred or where there was a loss of resistance in the epidural space), trial numbers, and block success. Additionally, occurrences of paresthesia and lower back pain during the procedure, as well as postoperative headaches following dural puncture, were queried and recorded.

After obtaining approval from the Ege University Faculty of Medicine Ethical Committee, the study was prospectively conducted in the operating room of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ege University Hospital. One hundred pregnant women classified as ASA I-II, between 37-42 gestational weeks, undergoing elective cesarean sections with neuraxial blocks (spinal and/or epidural), were included after obtaining their consent.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

Female

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients classified as ASA I-II
  • Patients at 37-42 gestational weeks
  • Patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under neuraxial block (spinal and/or epidural)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who did not consent to spinal anesthesia
  • Patients with contraindications for regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local or systemic infection)
  • Emergency patients

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 1 patient group

obstetric patient
Experimental group
Description:
Regional block procedures were performed on all patients included in the study in a sitting position, using the most appropriate interspinous space among L3-L4-L5-S1. Ultrasonography was conducted using a convex probe in the paramedian and transverse planes, and the images were recorded. Regional (spinal and/or epidural) anesthesia was provided by entering the lumbar space identified with ultrasonography.
Treatment:
Other: The use of ultrasound in central blocks

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems