ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Impact of Virtual Reality Hypno-sedation on Functional Recovery and Anxiety in Foot Surgery With Regional Anesthesia

U

University of Liege

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Foot Deformities
Valgus; Hallux
Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
Analgesia

Treatments

Drug: Midazolam injection
Device: Virtual reality
Device: Hypnosedation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05558449
VRH.foot

Details and patient eligibility

About

This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of a virtual reality hypnosedation (VRH)protocol reduces preoperative anxiety and increases patient comfort before, during, and after outpatient foot surgery.

Full description

This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of a virtual reality hypnosedation (VRH) protocol reduces preoperative anxiety and increases patient comfort before, during, and after outpatient foot surgery. The investigators hope to demonstrate a reduction in anxiety, improved postoperative experience and functional recovery according to currently validated scores measuring preoperative and postoperative recovery, anxiety and stress, and experience during a regional anesthesia technique.

The investigators expect that VRH will be more effective than VR alone and conventional pharmacological sedation in reducing preoperative anxiety and in improving experience and functional recovery. If the hypothesis is correct, the investigators could propose to integrate this protocol as a first line in the ambulatory management of elective foot surgery.

Enrollment

57 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Major patients, classified as ASA 1-2-3, admitted for foot surgery (metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis or hallux valgus cure), under peripheral locoregional anesthesia (sciatic nerve block at popliteal level).

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnant women
  • patients with peripheral neuropathy or other severe neurological pathology
  • allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics or benzodiazepines
  • chronic renal failure or severe hepatic failure
  • major hemostasis disorders
  • severe vision or hearing problems that would render the VR and VRH device useless or unusable, and patient contraindication or refusal to use the VRH headset, such as claustrophobia or kinesiophobia.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

57 participants in 3 patient groups

VR
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in the VR group (19 patients) will receive VR alone without hypnosedation. The VR headset will be used on these patients without an external voice or device allowing hypnosis. The VR module used will be "Silva", i.e. a scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons.
Treatment:
Device: Virtual reality
VRH
Experimental group
Description:
The patients in the VRH group (19 patients) will benefit from a hypnosedation session with a VRH headset during the local anesthesia technique and during the surgery (approximately 60 minutes). The VRH module used will be "Silva", i.e. the same scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons with a voice accompanying the hypnosis session.
Treatment:
Device: Hypnosedation
C
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in group C (control group, 19 patients) will receive only midazolam-based pharmacological sedation. This will be administered with intermittent boluses of 1 mg until patient comfort and sedation on the Richmond analgo-sedation scale (RASS) of -3 (response to verbal stimulus) is achieved.
Treatment:
Drug: Midazolam injection

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems