Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This clinical trial aims to compare two drilling protocols Underdrilling and Osseodensification for placing dental implants in patients with low bone density. The purpose is to compare which technique provides better primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior regions of the jaw with low bone density. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in implant stability between the two protocols.
Full description
Achieving sufficient primary stability becomes difficult in areas with low bone density. One technique commonly used is Underdrilling protocol.With the Underdrilling technique, the final osteotomy is smaller than the diameter of the implant to be placed.A relatively new Osseodensification protocol, introduced by Huwais in 2013, employs specially designed bur that smoothly compact the bone as they expand an osteotomy. This may prove to be particularly helpful in cases with low bone quality.This clinical trial aims to compare the implant stability using these drilling protocols
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
38 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Dr.Sanjay Tewari, MDS; Chain Shilpa, MDS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal