Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME) has standardized rectal cancer surgery and improved oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (NACRT) has further improved oncological benefit. Although these strategies result in good 5-year disease-free survival rates, they are associated with significant morbidity, in particular permanent long-term bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction. In rectal cancer management, the main objective of organ preservation is to avoid or reduce morbidity and impact on quality of life after rectal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes.
The aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a defined response monitoring program, including a shared decision process, as a strategy for assessing tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
This is a national, phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing the tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making, versus standard tumor response assessment in organ preservation strategies in rectal cancer.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patient aged 18 to 80
Histologically proven lieberkuhnian adenocarcinoma with MSS status ;
Patient who has or is due to receive neoadjuvant treatment (4 to 6 courses of (m)FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy + CAP 50 radiochemotherapy or CAP 50 radiochemotherapy alone);
BEFORE any neoadjuvant treatment:
Tumor classified T2T3 (on MRI)
N0-N1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes * or size ≤ 8 mm) (on MRI)
* positive node = node size > 5 mm minor axis and/or morphologically suspicious appearance Tumor size ≤4 cm (ON MRI)
No distant metastasis (M0)_ TAP scan or PET scan
≤ 8 cm from anal margin (On MRI) (Clinical examination*)
*if the clinical examination is not possible, then the source data is that of the MRI.
No invasion of the anal canal and/or sphincters (internal and external) (On MRI)
Operable patient
Ability to comply with the protocol and follow-up appointments (repeated assessment consultations and close follow-up if randomized to the Experimental Group);
Person affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme;
Free and informed consent signed by the patient.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
270 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Quentin DENOST
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal