Importance of Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Region Skane

Status: Completed

Conditions: Osteoarthritis

Treatments: Device: ABG II modular femoral component; Procedure: Stryker Navigation System; Procedure: GF hip guide

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01512550

HipBiomech-SK

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the importance of restoring the exact individual hip biomechanics during total hip arthroplasty.

Full description

This prospective, controlled and randomized study aims at evaluating the correlation between postoperative hip prosthesis migration and the achieved exactness of biomechanical restoration of hip mechanics during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The main objective is to find out how close the result from the surgery can come to a preferred prosthesis position and whether this makes any difference in terms of loosening, functionality and quality of life for the patient. The prosthesis positioning is performed with either (1) computer assisted navigation, (2) instrumented hip guide measuring devise alignment technique or (3) conventional non-instrumented measuring technique. The ABG II stem system (Stryker) will be used in the modular version for group 1 and 2 and the non-modular version in group 3. Before each operation the investigators will perform exact measurements of anatomical variables using preoperative radiographs (maximum 8 weeks old) and computed tomography images (CT)(taken 3-4 weeks preoperatively). While applying these measurements the investigators will try to preserve the patient´s individual biomechanical situation, most often as compared to the healthy contralateral hip. The variables to be analysed are anteversion of the femoral neck, offset and leg length. This preoperative hip analysis combined with the use of a templating system will give the data needed for component choice and exact positioning of the ABG II hip prosthesis. 75 patients will be randomized into the three groups (25+25+25). The patients will be followed with RadioStereometric Analysis (RSA) for two years (directly postoperatively, 14 days, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years). There will be a second CT scan 1 year postoperatively to measure the actual achieved position. In completion hip specific and general health questionnaires will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction and outcome. All patients will be subject to 3-Dimensional (3-D) gait analysis 3-4 weeks prior to surgery and after one year. The results of the gait analysis will be correlated to the achieved restoration of the hip anatomy and biomechanics. The investigators aim is to improve the fundamental understanding of the hip biomechanics in patients undergoing THA. Will physical performance improve when the individual hip biomechanics is better restored, and in which way and to what extent?

Enrollment: 75 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 40 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip necessitating primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)
• Male and non-pregnant female patients
• Hip bone quality and morphology suitable for uncemented THA
• Age up to 75 years old at the inclusion time of the study
• Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed follow-up.
• Patients who are capable of, and have given informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

• Rheumatoid arthritis
• Malignant disease
• Severe osteoporosis
• Patients with active infection
• Patients with malignancy
• Prior major surgery in the hip to be operated on
• Peroperative fracture
• Hip prosthesis or grossly distorted hip anatomy in the contralateral hip.
• Ongoing corticosteroid (oral) or immunosuppressive medication
• Personal disorders (dementia, alcohol or drug abuse etc) suspected of making completion of the trial uncertain.
• Patients with concurrent illnesses which are likely to affect their outcome.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

75 participants in 3 patient groups

instrumented hip guide technique

Active Comparator group

Description:

A mechanical device used to measure and decide how the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular) should be implanted

Treatment:

Procedure: GF hip guide

Device: ABG II modular femoral component

conventional measuring technique

No Intervention group

Description:

Standard way of implanting the prosthesis (ABG II standard) without special measuring device or computer navigation technique

computer assisted navigation

Active Comparator group

Description:

A method to use computer navigation when positioning and sizing the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular).

Treatment:

Procedure: Stryker Navigation System

Device: ABG II modular femoral component