Improving ImmunoSuppression Adherence After Liver or Kidney Transplantation (ISALK)

Medical University of Graz

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Adherence Intervention Post Transplantation

Treatments: Behavioral: Multilevel psychotherapeutic intervention programme

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04207125

32-062 ex 19/20

Details and patient eligibility

About

Indication: liver (LT) or kidney Transplantation (KT)

Objectives: to measure medication adherence in liver or kidney transplant patients with and without multilevel intervention programme over time

Trial Design: prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled study

Population: patients (male/female/diverse) between 18 and 90 years of age scheduled for LT or KT

Sample Size:

75 control patients (standard of care) 75 patients in treatment group (participation in multilevel intervention programme)

Statistical Analysis: The data will be analysed descriptively; continuous variables will be summarized using mean ± SD (standard deviation) or median, minimum and maximum and categorical data will be summarized using absolute and relative frequencies. For the primary outcome (Adherence to the immunosuppressive regime measured by BAASIS) and further categorical variables, differences between the groups will be assessed by the Pearson Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Group differences for continuous parameters will be assessed by the two-sample T-test or Mann-Whitney-U-test as appropriate.

Trial Duration and Dates: November 2019-October 2021

Full description

Organ transplantation is the best option for patients with chronic organ failure. After kidney (KT) or liver transplantations (LT), immunosuppressive medications have to be taken to avoid rejection. Lifelong adherence, the extent to which the patients behaviour matches the agreed upon prescribers recommendations, to immunosuppressive drugs is important to prevent graft failure (Pabst et al., 2015). The consequent immunosuppression intake and regular physician visits are important factors for a long transplant survival (Nöhre et al., 2018).

A high rate of immunosuppressive medication non-adherence and its impact on post-transplant graft function indicate a need for adherence enhancing interventions (De Bleser et al., 2011).

Non-adherence is linked to poor post-transplant outcomes including late acute rejection and graft loss (De Geest S. et al 2011; Dew MA et al 2008). Dew et al. concluded from a meta- analysis of 147 transplantation studies that nonadherence in renal allograft recipients was highest among solid organ transplant recipients, reaching 36 cases per 100 patients per year (Dew et al., 2007). Detection of adherence can be obtained by objective direct measures (observation that medication was taken) or indirect and subjective measures like self-reporting. The indirect measures include serum drug levels, biological markers and electronic monitoring. Adherence is a dynamic process with the need to be repetitive over time. The monitoring should be incorporated into the routine clinical management of all organ recipients. A recent study showed that combining self-reporting, assay and clinicians report yielded the highest sensitivity (72%) and specificity (42%) when compared to electronic monitoring (Low et al., 2019). Some new evidence suggest that moving from twice-daily to once-daily dosing of the immunosuppressive regimen, the calcineurin inhibitor, show indifferent prevalence rates with increased adherence or not improving the adherence (Lehner et al., 2018; Fellström et al., 2018).The aim of our study is to test the efficacy of such a multilevel education and psychosomatic intervention programme for improving medication adherence in patients after LT or KT.

1. Primary Objective and Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is the assessment of patient adherence using a validated version of the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS) questionnaire.
2. Secondary Objectives and Secondary Endpoints Secondary endpoints include the influence of the multilevel intervention programme on the coefficient of variation (CV%) of Tacrolimus (TAC), clinical outcomes including incidence of infections, acute rejection, liver and kidney values, death, graft loss, hospital readmission during the study period, side effects, number of trough level controls necessary during first 6 months, and achievement of TAC target concentrations.

Enrollment: 150 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients (male/female) listed for LT and KT
• Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the trial
• Fluent in speaking the German language
• Written informed consent must be available before enrolment in the trial
• Basis immunosuppression with Tacrolimus

Exclusion criteria

• Patients < 18 or > 90 years
• Pregnant or lactating women
• Refusal to participate

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

150 participants in 2 patient groups

Without multilevel intervention

No Intervention group

Description:

patients after liver or kidney transplantation / standard care

With multilevel intervention

Active Comparator group

Description:

patients after liver or kidney transplantation / multilevel intervention program

Treatment:

Behavioral: Multilevel psychotherapeutic intervention programme