Improving Surgical Communication for Patients in Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin (UW)

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Surgical Procedure, Unspecified; Surgeons

Treatments: Other: Surveys; Other: Focus Group; Behavioral: Training on communication framework

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06647303

A539750 (Other Identifier)

Protocol Version 4/17/2025 (Other Identifier)

2024-1354

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new training program to support communication between surgeons and their patients. The goal of the training program is to help patients get the information they need to make treatment decisions that are right for them.

Participants will complete surveys, attend a focus group, or receive training on Better Conversations, depending on the type of participant.

Full description

Observational research shows that surgeons translate informed consent and shared decision-making standards into an overly complicated technical explanation of the patient's disease and treatment, and an overly simplified narrative that surgery will "fix" the patient's problem. They omit critical information about the goals and downsides of surgery and struggle to actualize the patient's role in medical decisions, while unintentionally concealing professional expertise. "Better Conversations" is a novel communication framework designed to address these problems. With this framework, surgeons provide context about clinical norms, clearly establish the goals of surgery, and comprehensively delineate the downsides of surgery as experienced by the patient to generate a deliberative space for patients to consider whether surgery is right for them. This paradigm-shifting framework meets the legal and ethical standards for informed consent, supports deliberation, and allows patients to anticipate and prepare for the experience of surgery.

The present study supports optimization of surgeon training and study procedures (Phase II) that is needed before large scale testing and dissemination (Phase III). Although this intervention is evidence based, collaborative efforts are needed to ultimately test and disseminate a major clinical shift. The long-term goal is for every surgeon to use Better Conversations with every patient, every time. The present study has two main objectives: 1) To make the education program scalable with automated assessment and feedback to surgeons using audio recordings from their clinical conversations, and 2) to evaluate patient and family reported outcome measures regarding surgeon communication.

Enrollment: 580 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Surgeons:

• Surgeons from University of Wisconsin - Madison Department of Surgery who have an outpatient surgical clinic and treat adult patients at UW Health

Surgical candidates:

• Age 18 or older
• Present to an enrolled surgeon's clinic with a surgical problem
• Decision making ability
• Speak English

Stakeholders:

• Must have previous experience with surgery (within 10 years)
• Speak English

Exclusion criteria

Surgeons:

• Solely treat minors (under age 18)

Surgical candidates:

• Lacking decision making capacity
• Unable to speak English

Stakeholders:

• Unable to speak English

Trial design

Primary purpose: Health Services Research

Allocation: Non-Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

580 participants in 3 patient groups

Surgical candidate

Experimental group

Description:

Participants who are undergoing surgical consultation

Treatment:

Other: Surveys

Stakeholder Focus Group

Experimental group

Description:

Participants have previous experience with surgery

Treatment:

Other: Focus Group

Surgeons

Experimental group

Description:

Surgeons from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Surgery with an outpatient surgical clinic who treat adult patients at UW Health

Treatment:

Behavioral: Training on communication framework