ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Improving Work Flow Through Cognitive Ergonomics. An Intervention Study (SujuKE)

F

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ergonomics

Treatments

Behavioral: CE - Cognitive Ergonomics (KERGO)
Behavioral: RS - Recovery Support (KUORMA)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The main aim of the SujuKE study is to test the effectiveness of workplace cognitive ergonomics development program designed to decrease cognitively disrupting work conditions and work-related cognitive stress, and to improve work flow. The cognitive ergonomics workplace intervention includes cognitive ergonomics workshop, work experiments, and intervention task questionnaires. Its effect on changes in subjective measures of work conditions, work flow, stress, and work productivity will be studied. The hypothesis is that cognitive ergonomics intervention decreases the level of cognitive strain related to work conditions, and this change is associated with higher level in work flow, well-being, and productivity at work.

Full description

In the modern work life, performing work tasks rely on cognitive function, i.e. mental processes that are involved in processing information, such as attention, working memory, decision making and learning. Furthermore, the conditions at work include situations that require cognitive capacity. Information overload, multitasking and interruptions are typical features in any work. Thus, in the modern work life, work is knowledge work or information work by nature, and cognitive strain is a notable psychosocial risk factor. Not only task demands per se can exceed natural limitations of human cognitive capacities, but also the conditions at work can make it demanding for a human to perform.

Research shows that psychosocial stress, including cognitive stress, challenges wellbeing, safety and productivity at work. Cognitively straining conditions, such as disruptions, interruptions and information overload are related to higher levels of work stress, occupational accidents, and cognitive failures at work. It is essential to decrease harmful consequences to individual workers, organizations, and the society by managing psychosocial risks typical to cognitively demanding work tasks and conditions.

SujuKE study focuses on ergonomics (or human factors) practices that aim to ensure 'appropriate interaction between work, product and environment, and human needs, capabilities and limitations'. In cognitive ergonomics, the focus is on making human-system interaction compatible with human cognitive abilities and limitations, particularly at work. The aim is to apply general principles and good practices of cognitive ergonomics that help to avoid unnecessary cognitive load at work and that improve human performance.

The aim of the SujuKE study is to improve the conditions of knowledge work and promote the flow of work and reduce work strain. There are studies which show that decreasing disruptions, providing uninterrupted working time, and reducing information may lead to improved work flow and productivity. In the SujuKE-study, several sources of cognitive strain are restricted and concrete methods to help improve cognitive ergonomics will be worked on and implemented at workplace. The objective of the project is to obtain research evidence of the effects of cognitive ergonomics development programme on working conditions, the flow of work, well-being at work, and the productivity at work.

During the SujuKE project, the investigators will implement measures at the workplace that aim to facilitate work and reduce strain. The objective of the project is to obtain research evidence of the effects of these measures on working conditions, the flow of work, well-being at work, and the productivity at work. The study is carried out by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) and funded by the Finnish Work Environment Fund.

Enrollment

927 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The participants in the study work in the participating organizations were recruited through direct contacts and by informing about the study in various events.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participating organization offers several comparable teams (regarding type of tasks and demands) for study
  • The participating units (in organizations) include knowledge workers, such as office workers and experts

Whose

  • work tasks are cognitively rather than physically demanding
  • work requires learning and updating knowledge and skills
  • information and communication technology is the main tool at work.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

927 participants in 3 patient groups

Cognitive ergonomics Intervention
Experimental group
Treatment:
Behavioral: CE - Cognitive Ergonomics (KERGO)
Stress management Intervention
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: RS - Recovery Support (KUORMA)
Passive control
No Intervention group
Description:
"Passive Control" groups receive no intervention at all.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems