Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The objective of this study is to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics and vibroarthrography (VAG) signals for subjects implanted with Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS), CR (Cruciate Retaining), and Bi-Cruciate Retaining (XR) TKAs.
Full description
The objective of this study is to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics and vibroarthrography (VAG) signals for subjects implanted with Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS), CR (Cruciate Retaining), and Bi-Cruciate Retaining (XR) TKAs. The Journey II BCS Knee System was designed to resect and replicate both the PCL and ACL, the Journey II CR System retains the posterior cruciate ligament, while the Journey II XR System retains the cruciate and collateral ligaments so they remain intact.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
60 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal