ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT (IDVD)

Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) logo

Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS)

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Patients With Spinal Stenosis Indicated for LLIF

Treatments

Procedure: One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Indirect Decompression
Procedure: One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Direct Decompression

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04708977
2019-2228

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing 1-level lateral lumbar spinal fusion. This study seeks to randomize patients indicated for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) into one of two groups: direct decompression and indirect decompression.

Full description

While indirect decompression has been largely accepted as a strategy to treat foraminal stenosis, there is some disagreement regarding its efficacy in treating patients with central and lateral recess stenosis. The current study seeks to randomize patients indicated for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) into one of two groups: direct decompression and indirect decompression. Enrolled participants will be evaluated before surgery, during their hospital course and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Operative details, complications, reoperation rates, patient reported outcomes, clinical and radiographic outcome measures will be compared.

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Fusion indicated by the treating surgeon. Fusion may be indicated for one or more of the following reasons:

    • Mobile degenerative spondylolisthesis
    • Severe vertical foraminal stenosis
    • Adjacent segment degeneration and/or degenerative disc disease with suspected discogenic pain
  • One-level central canal stenosis

    • WITH neurogenic claudication
    • As measured in preoperative MRI
  • Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score > 35% (18/50)

  • Failed 3 months of conservative treatment

  • Willing to give written informed consent and psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to comply fully with protocol, including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements, and filling out forms

Exclusion criteria

  • Multilevel central canal stenosis
  • Patients with vertebral endplate dimensions that are too small to allow for safe placement of an intervertebral cage
  • Known allergy to titanium, polyethylene, cobalt, chromium, or molybdenum
  • Prior surgery at index disc level (discectomy, decompression, or fusion)
  • History of spinal or vertebral infection of the lumbar spine
  • History of vertebral fracture of the lumbar spine
  • Current pregnancy or interest in becoming pregnant over the next 1 year
  • Active infection-systemic or local
  • Non-English speakers

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

0 participants in 2 patient groups

Group 1: Indirect Decompression
Active Comparator group
Description:
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), with indirect decompression
Treatment:
Procedure: One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Indirect Decompression
Group 2: Direct Decompression
Active Comparator group
Description:
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), with direct decompression
Treatment:
Procedure: One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Direct Decompression

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems