Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Prevention (MYTHOS)

Centro Cardiologico Monzino

Status and phase: Unknown; Phase 3

Conditions: Contrast Induced Nephropathy

Treatments: Drug: Furosemide and matched saline hydration; Drug: isotonic saline solution

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT00702728

EUDRACT No: 2008-001200-23

R100-CCFM S103/208

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is being proposed with the objective to assess the potential benefits of induced diuresis by furosemide with matched hydration therapy compared to standard hydration in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). It is expected that matched hydration will prove to be as effective as hydration alone, will avoid an overnight stay prior to the procedure, and thus will prove to be a less costly and more clinically manageable solution to the prevention of CIN.

Full description

Radiocontrast agents (contrast) are widely used in coronary and peripheral vascular catheterization procedures. Although the use of these iodine-containing agents is vital for these procedures, it can be associated with adverse side effects. CIN is one of the most important adverse effects of contrast agents, and can cause substantial morbidity and mortality.

Although the exact mechanisms remain unknown, intravenous hydration before the catheterization procedure is the only current treatment that has been shown to reduce the incidence of CIN. However, in patients with baseline impairments in renal function, hydration is commonly performed at a rate significantly lower than that shown to provide protection due to the fear of overhydration and pulmonary edema. Previous studies have used diuretics to increase urine output and prevent overhydration. In addition to the benefit of increased urine flow, loop diuretics, such as furosemide, should be expected to provide additive benefit against another potential mechanism of CIN, medullary ischemia, as they reduce sodium reabsorption, and consequentially oxygen consumption, of the kidney. While the results of their use have been mixed, it appears that furosemide was deleterious in patients who became dehydrated, i.e. those in whom the urine output was substantially greater than the rate of hydration they received.

This problem may be overcome by a device, which is now available on the market, called the RenalGuard System. The System is capable of delivering saline solution to a patient in an amount matched to the volume of urine produced by the patient. The purpose of this matched fluid replacement is to prevent hypovolemia that may lead to hypotension or fluid overload.The aim of the study is to compare furosemide-induced diuresis with matched hydration therapy compared to standard hydration.

Enrollment: 120 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or non-pregnant female equal or greater than the age of 18 years old.
2. Scheduled to undergo a non-emergent catheterization procedure with anticipated to use ≥80 ml contrast media. Additional other procedure (e.g., left ventriculography, imaging of grafts, stenting, etc.) are allowable other than those listed below as exclusion criteria #1.
3. Subject is clinically stable for >24hrs defined as Killip Class 1
4. Baseline Renal Function eGFR < 60ml/min, by MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) calculator.
5. Patient has agreed to all follow-up testing.

Exclusion criteria

1. Catheterization procedure requiring a direct renal injection of contrast or an injection into the descending aorta proximal to the renal arteries.
2. Requires emergent catheterization or primary percutaneous intervention.
3. Subject is anuric, has been hospitalized for any change in renal function or has undergone renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis or hemofiltration) within the past month.
4. Known inability to place a Foley catheter
5. Currently has a known electrolyte imbalance or clinically significant arrhythmias which compromise subject's hemodynamic state.
6. Has received intravenous contrast within 10 days of procedure or has a planned procedure using contrast within 72 hours following the procedure.
7. Has documented respiratory insufficiency as evidenced by an oxygen saturation of < 90% on room air assessed on day of procedure.
8. Currently receiving or expected to receive Mannitol or Lithium therapy
9. Planned addition, discontinuation or dose adjustment of the trimethoprim, cimetidine, metaclopramide and/or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 48 hours of the procedure.
10. Subject has a known hypersensitivity to furosemide.
11. Subject is currently, plans, or has been enrolled in another clinical study involving use of an investigational drug or device within the prior 30 days.
12. If female, subject is pregnant or breastfeeding.
13. Subject is unable to provide informed consent.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

120 participants in 2 patient groups

1

Experimental group

Description:

Furosemide and matched saline hydration by RenalGuard system

Treatment:

Drug: Furosemide and matched saline hydration

2

Active Comparator group

Description:

Standard IV saline infusion

Treatment:

Drug: isotonic saline solution