ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Information Improvement for Surgical Patients Through Portable Video Media

H

Hospital Universitario Puerto Real

Status

Completed

Conditions

Bladder Cancer
Prostatic Hyperplasia

Treatments

Other: Written informed consent
Other: Informed consent trough a portable video media

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02846467
HospitalUPR

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to evaluate the comprehension of the Informed consent with the Standard Verbal Communication (SVC) versus Portable Video Media (PVM).

Full description

The informed consent (IC) is a fully ethical and legal consolidated requirement. IC is the voluntary authorization by a patient for surgical treatment (MeSH). The IC has to include: 1. What is and for what is it, 2. How is it made, 3. What effect will produce, 4. which patients will benefit, 5. Alternatives, 6. Risks and special situations.

The standard IC is based in written and verbal information, but the information provided is insufficient, leading to misunderstanding and even litigation.

Technology plays an important role in the improvement of IC: the portable video media, tablet, with the application (app) iURO assists the procedure through videos and illustrations.

To evaluate and measure the comprehension of the information that patients received, we elaborated and validated a "Questionnaire to evaluate the comprehension of IC" (the process was mounted as "Questionnaire for urology IC validation" in the poster session at the 17th International European Association of Urology Nurses (EAUN) Meeting, Munich-Germany).

The patients undergoing to bladder or prostate transurethral resection were selected. Afterwards they were randomized previous the interview, into two groups: patients informed by PVM with the app iUro (experimental group) versus patients with an SVC (control group). The questionnaire was used to compare the comprehension of the surgery immediately and 15 days after the surgery. The items regarding questionnaire were: information, utility of the intervention, side effects, complications, comorbidity, usefulness of information, anxiety and risks.

Enrollment

193 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are going to receive transurethral resection of bladder or prostate
  • Patients, women and men, older than 18 years without any mental disability

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patients who have inability to communicate in spanish.
  • Several visual problems that limit the ability to read written material

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

193 participants in 2 patient groups

Portable video media
Experimental group
Description:
Patients who receive informed consent trough portable video media around 10 minutes
Treatment:
Other: Informed consent trough a portable video media
Traditional IC
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients who receive traditional IC (written consent) during 10 to 15 minutes
Treatment:
Other: Written informed consent

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems