ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Injection of Tenoxicam Versus Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

A

Ataturk University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 1

Conditions

Arthrocentesis

Treatments

Drug: Tenoxicam Injectable Product

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Full description

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) is a very painful disease that disrupts the patient's comfort of life. Arthrocentesis alone or in combination with intraarticular injections is highly effective in the treatment of TMJ-OA. It reduces pain, increases mouth opening, and improves jaw movements. In intra-articular injections, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are used. Tenoxicam is an NSAID that is used systemically or locally in joint diseases such as acute or chronic inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. It has been reported that its long-lasting analgesic effect and anti-inflammatory effect are higher in intra-articular administration than in oral and intravenous administrations , to our knowledge, there has been no such study analysing the effectiveness of intra-articular application of tenoxicam in patients with TMJ-OA. The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

22 to 64 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical and radiological diagnosis of TMJ-OA
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Sufficient clinical data at baseline and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Neurological disease
  • Previous TMJ surgery
  • Malignant disease in the head and neck region

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Tenoxicam
Active Comparator group
Description:
The Tenoxicam group (n:16) received both arthrocentesis and a 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint.
Treatment:
Drug: Tenoxicam Injectable Product
Control
Active Comparator group
Description:
Only arthrocentesis was given to patients in the control group
Treatment:
Drug: Tenoxicam Injectable Product

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems