ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Innovative Approaches to Increase F&V Intake Thru Worksites (Good to Go)

Brown University logo

Brown University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 2

Conditions

Eating Behavior
Food Habits

Treatments

Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention
Other: Access Intervention
Behavioral: Comparison Behavioral Intervention

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02729675
R01CA133396

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this project is to study the efficacy of a delivery system to offer fresh fruits and vegetables (F&V) at discount prices for purchase at worksites in conjunction with educational interventions on increasing employees' F&V consumption in comparison to an intervention receiving fruit and vegetable markets alone or a comparison intervention.

Full description

"Good to Go" (GTG) is a cluster randomized trial, which is studying the efficacy of innovative multi-level worksite interventions including educational/behavioral interventions and/or a fruit and vegetable (F&V) market at the worksite to improve F&V intake of employees. The hypothesis is that providing convenient, inexpensive access to F&V at the workplace through a F&V market will increase the availability of F&V at the workplace as well as at home and increase F&V intake of the employee. However, because it is unclear if improving F&V access and availability alone is adequate to increase F&V intake, the investigators will test the efficacy of the F&V delivery intervention alone and in combination with a promotional/educational intervention delivered at the worksite. The efficacy of these innovative interventions will be tested during a cluster randomized trial with 21 worksites to determine which interventions are most efficacious in increasing F&V consumption.

The primary specific aims of this proposed research are to employ a cluster randomized trial to study the efficacy of delivering fresh F&V at reduced prices for purchase at worksites (access intervention); the F&V delivery intervention paired with educational interventions to change informational and social environments at the worksite (enhanced intervention); and a comparison intervention acting as an attention placebo. The study will compare the efficacy of the Access intervention and the enhanced intervention with the comparison Arm and will also compare the efficacy of the Access intervention to the Enhanced intervention.

Enrollment

1,804 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • works at least 25 hours per week at the worksite
  • is on-site at least half of every day shift during the week
  • reads and understands English.

Exclusion criteria

  • has a medical condition that would prevent consumption of most fruits and vegetables,

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

1,804 participants in 3 patient groups

Access Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Worksites in this condition received weekly Fruit and Vegetable markets
Treatment:
Other: Access Intervention
Enhanced Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Worksites in this condition received weekly Fruit and Vegetable markets and Educational Interventions including Campaigns, Newsletters, DVDs, A Website, and Chef Demonstrations
Treatment:
Other: Access Intervention
Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention
Comparison Intervention
Active Comparator group
Description:
Worksites in this condition received Stress and Physical Activity Interventions
Treatment:
Behavioral: Comparison Behavioral Intervention

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems