ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Integrated Services for Pain: Interventions to Reduce Pain Effectively (INSPIRE)

RTI International logo

RTI International

Status

Completed

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Treatments

Behavioral: Shared Decision Making
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03454555
PCORI-OPD-1610-37006

Details and patient eligibility

About

Long-term pain -or pain that lasts for months or years-is one of the most common health problems in the United States. Clinicians often prescribe opioids which can help ease pain in the short term, but evidence does not support their effectiveness over the long term. For some people, long-term opioid use can lead to addiction and overdose. People need effective options and support to help maintain or improve their function and quality of life.

This study compared two programs for helping people living with long-term pain who have been prescribed opioids for 3 or more months. This study was done at primary care and pain care clinics at 3 health systems in the Southeastern United States.

The study team assigned people by chance to one of two study programs: (1) individual motivational interviewing plus group-based cognitive behavioral therapy (MI+CBT) or (2) patient-clinician shared decision making. In the MI+CBT program, the patient learned strategies to better cope with chronic pain. In the SDM program, the patient and clinician worked together through enhanced communication to make decisions that aligned with values and preferences of the patient.

The study team compared the two programs by looking at changes in opioid dosage, physical functioning, and pain interference over time. They collected information about prescribed opioid dosage from electronic health records and patients completed surveys at the start of the study and 6 and 12 months later.

The study team worked with an advisory group that included patients, advocates, clinicians, and pain experts. The advisory group met with the study team two to three times per year to provide input on the study.

Full description

Objective:

To compare the effectiveness of individual motivational interviewing plus group-based cognitive behavioral therapy (MI+CBT) versus patient-clinician shared decision making (SDM) on change in daily dosage of prescribed opioids, physical functioning, and pain interference for individuals with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP).

Rationale:

About 24% of Americans suffer from CNCP and clinicians often prescribe opioids to treat it. Once on chronic opioid therapy (COT), individuals often continue with this class of medication for years. Evidence for the effectiveness of COT to treat CNCP is limited, exposing individuals to known risks. Modified or novel pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies are needed to improve pain management and promote informed decision making regarding possible opioid dose reduction.

Study Design and Approach:

This was a large-scale, pragmatic randomized controlled trial implementing pharmacotherapy guidelines and behavioral interventions in real-world settings. A key eligibility criterion was individuals who were prescribed ≥ 20 milligrams of morphine equivalents for more than three months.

Interventions:

Researchers examined the comparative effectiveness of MI+CBT versus SDM for who are on COT. Neither approach is directive, and both support patient choice. Although MI+CBT and SDM are both behavioral intervention strategies, they differ in content covered and training of those delivering the intervention (behavioral vs. medical). Participants in both study arms received guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy treatment, based on clinical guidelines for opioid therapy for CNCP.

Outcomes:

  • Primary: The change from baseline in average daily prescribed opioid dosage, measured in milligrams of morphine equivalents, at 12 months, with secondary time points at 6 months and 18 months
  • Secondary: The change from baseline to 6 and 12 months (primary timepoint) in the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Pain Interference and PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Physical Function scales.

Timeline:

The project commenced in February 2018. Participant recruitment occurred from June 2019 to March 2022. Delivery of the intervention occurred on a rolling basis through March 2023.

Recruitment, Screening, Enrollment, and Randomization:

The study randomized 525 participants from primary care and pain clinics at three medical centers in North Carolina and Tennessee. The researchers identified individuals who were potentially eligible through electronic health records and invited them to participate. A Research Coordinator contacted individuals to complete screening, enrollment, and randomization.

Data Collection:

The researchers collected validated patient-reported outcomes through Web-based and phone-based surveys and leveraged existing harmonized electronic health record (EHR) data for clinical outcomes.

Data Analysis:

Outcomes were analyzed for all randomized participants in an intent-to-treat fashion, irrespective of the amount of intervention received. Because some individuals did not attend an intervention session, sensitivity analyses were based on a modified intent-to-treat population limited to participants receiving at least 1 intervention session and a per-protocol population limited to participants receiving at least four CBT or SDM sessions.

Changes from baseline were analyzed with a repeated measures linear model accounting for correlation of measurements over time, with effects for intervention arm, time interval as a categorical predictor, intervention-by-time interaction, and adjustment for baseline value and study site. Differential treatment effects for two preplanned subgroups based on sex and prior mental health diagnosis, as defined by IDC-10 codes recorded in the EHR, were assessed at 12 months via a subgroup-by-intervention interaction within the repeated measures model.

Qualitative research methods were used to obtain participant input on their experiences.

Enrollment

543 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 to 85 years
  • History of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP)
  • Receiving chronic opioid therapy for CNCP as evidenced by current or most recent prescription of an average daily prescribed dosage of 20 milligrams of morphine equivalents
  • Receiving care at a participating clinic from a participating provider, as evidenced by at least 1 in-person visit within the past 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Not meeting the above inclusion criteria
  • Opioid use is for pain directly related to an active cancer diagnosis
  • Opioid use is for maintenance treatment of an opioid use disorder
  • Suicide attempt within the past 3 years
  • Active suicidal ideation
  • Currently receiving Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
  • Non-English speaking
  • Other reason at the discretion of the investigator

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

543 participants in 2 patient groups

Shared Decision Making (SDM)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Shared Decision Making (SDM) participants received guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy based on clinical guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain plus the SDM intervention during their opioid management visits.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Shared Decision Making
Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (MI+CBT-CP)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (MI+CBT-CP) participants received the guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy based on clinical guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain plus the MI+CBT-CP intervention.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems