Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus nasal CPAP( continuous positive airway pressure) (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.
Design: non-inferiority study, prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.
Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS >3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups: "n-CPAP"(nasal continuous positive airway pressure) or "HFNC" during 24 hours.
Conditions of measurements:
Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.
Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen
) required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (carbon dioxide partial pressure) (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2
Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis. Expected number of patients: 71 per arm: 142 children.
Study Schedule: October 2014-April 2016
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
142 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Christophe MILESI, Doctor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal