ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Intermediate Normal Versus High Normal Oxygen Levels in the Emergency Department for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (INACHOS)

E

Evangelismos Hospital

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Acute Brain Injury
Acute Respiratory Failure

Treatments

Other: Oxygen

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05464277
286/18-6-2020

Details and patient eligibility

About

Despite almost universal usage of supplemental oxygen therapy in patients presenting in the emergency department with traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal oxygen levels are unclear.

The investigators propose a pilot multi-center randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that maintaining intermediate normal as opposed to high normal oxygen levels in patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI is feasible, and to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of the two approaches to oxygen therapy. The aim is that the investigators produce pilot data, which could inform the design of potential subsequent larger clinical trials.

Full description

Despite the worldwide burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI), medical research on the field as opposed to other health problems is underrepresented. Consequently, there are few data to support commonly used interventions for the management of TBI, especially in the setting of the emergency department. For example, despite almost universal usage of supplemental oxygen therapy, the effects of different oxygenation levels under normobaric conditions on outcomes of patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI are unknown.

On the one hand, liberal oxygenation may provide a margin of safety against hypoxemia and may be needed to meet the high oxygen demands of an acutely altered brain physiology. On the other hand, there are increasing concerns that excessive oxygen supplementation may have harmful effects, such as central nervous system toxicity, cerebral vasoconstriction, impaired immunity leading to predisposition to infections (including pneumonia) and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Such effects could be avoided by intermediate normal oxygen levels.

Taken together, the relative merits and risks of the abovementioned two approaches to oxygen therapy (namely, intermediate normal versus high normal oxygen levels) of patients with TBI in terms of important clinical outcomes (namely, development of nosocomial pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, disability and mortality) remain undefined. This suggests the need for randomized controlled trials. However, randomized controlled trials focusing on patient-centered outcomes should be preceded by pilot randomized controlled trials, which demonstrate a separation in treatment and protocol compliance (feasibility) associated with the studied interventions.

Therefore, the investigators propose a pilot multi-center randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that maintaining intermediate normal as opposed to high normal oxygen levels in patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI is feasible, and to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of the two approaches to oxygen therapy.

Enrollment

1 patient

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient ≥18 years
  • Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8
  • Non-penetrating traumatic brain injury
  • Intubated patient

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18 years
  • Lack of intention to admit to the intensive care unit
  • Moribund patient expected to die within 24 hours
  • Expected need for mechanical ventilation < 24 hours
  • Time interval from intubation to group allocation more than 60 minutes
  • Penetrating traumatic brain injury
  • Pregnancy
  • Lack of equipoise of the treating clinician
  • Lack of informed consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

1 participants in 2 patient groups

Intermediate normal oxygen
Active Comparator group
Description:
For the "intermediate normal oxygen" group, an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 95-97% will be recommended in the light of the Improving Oxygen Therapy in Acute-illness (IOTA) meta-analysis. The acceptable lower limit of PaO2 will be set to 80 mmHg according to a recent consensus of experts endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The lower-limit and higher-limit monitor alarm for SpO2 will be set at 94% and 98%, respectively. In case that the emergency department of a study site uses ventilators, which allow for only two options of FiO2 titration (namely, "air mix" and "FiO2 of 1.0"), then the "intermediate normal oxygen" group should receive "air mix".
Treatment:
Other: Oxygen
High normal oxygen
Active Comparator group
Description:
For the "high normal oxygen" group, an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 99-100% will be recommended. The lower-limit monitor alarm for SpO2 will be set at 98%. No upper alarm limit for SpO2 will be set. In case that the emergency department of a study site uses ventilators, which allow for only two options of FiO2 titration (namely, "air mix" and "FiO2 of 1.0"), then the "high normal oxygen" group should receive "FiO2 of 1.0".
Treatment:
Other: Oxygen

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ilias I Siempos, MD, DSc; Vassilis G Giannakoulis, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems