Interobserver Variation in Applying a Radiographic Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Society of Critical Care Medicine, China

Status: Completed

Conditions: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Treatments: Other: Training and education

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01704066

CCCCTG-2012-ARDS-01

2012BAI11B05 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The original American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) required bilateral infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema on frontal chest X-ray (CXR), but there is poor inter-observer reliability in interpreting CXR using this definition among intensivists and radiologists.

As a result, the newly published Berlin definition of ARDS specified that the CXR criterion should include bilateral opacities consistent with pulmonary edema not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules/masses on CXR.

In order to improve inter-observer agreement, the panel have also developed a set of CXRs judged as consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of this training set on inter-observer reliability in applying the radiographic definition for ARDS.

Full description

The study is composed of 3 phases:

Phase 1: All participants will be required to independently interpret a set of 12 CXRs, as provided by the consensus panel. The possible radiographic interpretations include consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.

Phase 2: Training materials adapted according to the recently published Berlin definition of ARDS, with its expanded rationale and interpretation of all 12 CXRs, will be sent to all participants.

Phase 3: The same set of 12 CXRs, in different order, will be sent to all participants for interpretation for the second time.

Enrollment: 286 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• intensivists working in the participating ICUs

Exclusion criteria

• those who could not participate both questionnaire surveys
• those who have read the reference with the training set of CXRs before the study
• those who have already known the objective of the study