Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Pneumonia, thought to be the chief aetiological process in the development of pleural space infection, is defined as an infection of the lung parenchyma with an estimated annual incidence rate of 5-11 cases per 1000 population, with around 50,000 hospital admissions in the U.K. per year. Parapneumonic effusions caused by an infection of the pleural membranes occur in 40-57% of cases of pneumonia. A variable percentage (10-20%) of parapneumonic effusions progresses to empyema (pus) and/or abscess formation (encapsulation). Pleural infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which may be as high as 20-35% in immunocompromised patients.
Standard treatment of these collections in adults involves antibiotic therapy, adequate drainage of infected fluid, and surgical intervention if conservative management fails. Appropriate treatment is adequate drainage via an intercostal catheter (ICC) with antibiotic therapy for parapneumonic effusions requiring clearance. Frequently, simple ICC drainage is ineffective due to the presence of loculations, formed predominantly by fibrinous material deposited in the fibrinopurulent phase of empyema, preventing free drainage of infected pleural fluid. The presence of fibrinous septae in the pleural space, known as loculations, may result in inadequate drainage of effusions and, therefore, nonresolution of infection and systemic sepsis. Surgical intervention (VATS or open) is usually required to clear loculations and resolve infection without adequate intercostal catheter drainage.
Although the success rate of surgical intervention remains high, the morbidity and mortality of both VATS and open thoracotomy are of concern, particularly in a cohort of patients who may be older and with significant comorbidity. Less invasive therapies, which promote pleural space drainage and effective resolution of pleural infection, are therefore likely to be of considerable clinical utility.
The MIST 2 trial has established intrapleural therapy as the mainstay of CPEE treatment, hence avoiding surgery and decreasing the length of hospitalization; however, little is known about the correct dosage needed for tPA and Dornase Alfa/Deoxyribonuclease (DNase). Dose and duration of intrapleural therapy based on MIST 2 involve multiple dosing and can be time-consuming for health care providers. Nevertheless, treatment of pleural infection with fibrinolytic therapy has been incorporated in the British Thoracic Society guideline 2023.
Another study in 2022 by Cheong et al. used a modified regimen of intrapleural alteplase 16 mg t-PA with 5 mg DNase for three doses administered sequentially within 24 h. In this study, a modified regimen of t-PA and DNase offers an alternative therapeutic option for patients who are unfit or refuse surgical intervention but have persistent pleural infection. They have demonstrated similar treatment success comparable to other studies, as evidenced by improved pleural fluid drainage and reduced pleural opacity on day 7 chest x-ray, approximately 50% from the baseline. The mechanism of action of t-PA and DNase in the pleural cavity remains unclear. Studies suggested that IPFT may trigger the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) pathway, which promotes pleural fluid formation and subsequently causes a therapeutic lavage effect that increases pleural fluid drainage.
Full description
Research Questions:
• Is there a difference in efficacy and safety between a combination of intrapleural alteplase (5 mg + tacholiquin, with intrapleural alteplase 5mg and DNase (Pulmozyme) 5mg in managing pleural infection?
Primary Objective:
• To compare the reduction of pleural opacity (in percentage) on chest radiograph from baseline (0-24 hours pre-intervention) to day 7 post-intervention between group A (alteplase + DNase) and group B (alteplase + tacholiquin)
Secondary Objectives:
To compare the absolute and percentage change in inflammatory markers (WBC/CRP) from baseline (0-24 hours pre-intervention) to day 7 between the two groups
To compare the volume of pleural effusion drainage (in mL) 72 hours following post-intervention between the two groups
To compare the outcome between the two groups:
Study Hypothesis
Study Design Retrospective, observational cohort; on patients with pleural infection exposure defined by intrapleural regimen received (Alteplase+DNase vs Alteplase+Tyloxapol) DNase from June 2023 to June 2025 in HCTM UKM and University Malaya Medical Centre.
Study Population Adult patients with pleural infection (complex pleural effusion or empyema) with poor outflow (≤ 150 cc) from chest drain after 24 Hours of insertion in medical and non-medical wards, HCTM UKM, and UMMC from June 2023 to June 2025.
Sample Size and Power of Study Following the guidance of the UH Bristol and Weston Clinical Audit Team (Version 5), a pragmatic snapshot sample of 40 cases for each arm was deemed sufficient to measure current practice against the pre-defined standard, prioritizing feasibility over formal statistical representativeness.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patient aged ≥ 18 years old
Patients with pleural infection (complex parapneumonic effusion or empyema) with poor pleural fluid drainage of ≤ 150 ml after 24 hours of chest drain insertion received either t-PA-DNAse or t-PA/Tyloxapol.
Clinical features consistent with pleural infection; fulfilling ≥ 2 of the following characteristics:
i) Clinical evidence of infection, such as fever and or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or total white blood count (TWBC) ii) Complex pleural effusion proven by thoracic ultrasound is defined as the presence of fibrin strands or septations within the pleural cavity iii) Pleural fluid that fulfils at least one of the characteristics:
Exclusion criteria
80 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid, MBBS(IIUM)
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal