ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Conventional Therapy for Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions (REC-CHIPCAC)

A

Air Force Military Medical University of People's Liberation Army

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses
De Novo Stenosis

Treatments

Procedure: Conventional lesion preparation strategy
Procedure: Intravascular Lithotripsy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06238518
KY20232390-C-1

Details and patient eligibility

About

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) encounters challenges with calcified coronary lesions, leading to potential issues such as failed balloon dilatation, incomplete stent expansion, and increased risks of adverse events post-PCI, including stent restenosis and thrombosis.

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a novel approach for severely calcified coronary lesion preparation, has shown promising preliminary outcomes. Combining IVL with conventional approaches, such as Rotational atherectomy (RA), non-compliant balloons, or cutting balloons, may associated with additional benefit than conventional approaches only in terms of better stent expansion and lower long-term adverse events.

This pilot randomized trial aims to investigate whether combining IVL to conventional therapy surpasses the efficacy of conventional approaches alone. The primary effectiveness endpoint is final stent expansion assessed by post-procedure optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the primary safety endpoint is target lesion failure (TVF). The trial seeks to provide valuable insights into the optimal approach for managing severely calcified coronary lesions during PCI.

Enrollment

220 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute or chronic coronary artery syndrome indicated for PCI with stenting.
  2. Able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Native and de novo coronary artery disease

  2. Lesion navigable by a 0.014" guidewire.

  3. Target lesion is severely calcified, meeting one of the following criteria:

    • Presence of calcium ≥ 270°, lengths ≥ 5mm, and thickness ≥ 0.5mm at one cross-section as assessed by OCT
    • If the OCT catheter is unable to pass through the target lesion after dilatation due to calcification or tortuosity, and the target lesion is severely calcified on both sides of the arterial wall during angiography, with the length of the calcification >15 mm, the lesion will be recognized as a severely calcified lesion, meeting the criteria for enrollment

Exclusion criteria

General Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients under 18 years of age.
  2. Incapable of providing informed consent.
  3. Female patients who are pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be conducted within 7 days before the index procedure for women of childbearing potential, as per local practice).
  4. Concurrent medical conditions with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  5. Hemodynamic instability.
  6. Known contraindications to medications such as Heparin, anticoagulation, antiplatelet drugs, or contrast.
  7. Active bleeding.
  8. New-onset stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days prior to enrollment.
  9. Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min).
  10. Patients scheduled to undergo cardiac intervention or cardiac surgery within 30 days of the index procedure.
  11. Recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 7 days or recent cardiogenic shock.
  12. Lesions located in surgical conduits.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target vessel exhibiting C-F type dissection.
  2. Thrombosis observed by angiography or OCT.
  3. Presence of an aneurysm within 10 mm of the target lesion.
  4. Left main ostial lesion

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

220 participants in 2 patient groups

Conventional lesion preparation plus Intravascular Lithotripsy strategy
Experimental group
Description:
IVL could be performed before, amidst, or after Conventional lesion preparation therapy; However, the use of IVL treatment is mandatory.
Treatment:
Procedure: Conventional lesion preparation strategy
Procedure: Intravascular Lithotripsy
Conventional lesion preparation strategy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Conventional lesion preparation strategy includes the use of Compliant, noncompliant, cutting, or scoring balloons, Excimer laser coronary atherectomy, or Rotational atherectomy at the discretion of the operator.
Treatment:
Procedure: Conventional lesion preparation strategy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ruining Zhang, BSc; Chao Gao,, M.D, Ph.D

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems