Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Current evidence and clinical applications of robotic gait training devices for motor function recovery post-stroke are increasingly available. Although existing research demonstrates that robotic gait training can improve patients' gait and balance, there remains a lack of in-depth investigation into its specific mechanisms of action concerning central nervous system (CNS) reorganization - notably, changes in activity within the motor cortex and associated neural networks. The intrinsic changes within the CNS have received insufficient attention, limiting a comprehensive and profound understanding of the rehabilitation outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying robotic gait training-induced neuroplasticity by integrating functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) technology with multi-dimensional lower limb motor function assessment tools (such as FAC, BBS, AMEDA, 10MWT, 6MWT, TUGT). It will systematically investigate the effects of robotic gait training on both the central nervous system and lower limb motor function in stroke patients. Furthermore, the study will compare the differences in functional recovery efficacy between robotic gait training and conventional rehabilitation therapies.
Full description
In this study, participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: the Welwalk training group and the conventional rehabilitation therapy group.
Welwalk Training Group: Each session will consist of 30 minutes of Welwalk robot-assisted training, followed by 15 minutes of gait training and 15 minutes of supplementary exercises.Control Group (Conventional Rehabilitation Therapy): Each session will consist of 45 minutes of gait training and 15 minutes of supplementary exercises.The intervention period will span 3 weeks, with sessions administered six times per week. Each session will last 1 hour.
Clinical assessments will be conducted by certified healthcare professionals at four time points: at baseline (prior to the commencement of formal training), and after the 1st week, 2nd week, and 3rd week of treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
38 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ming Kang, master of science
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal