Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Over the past few decades, fructose consumption has risen significantly in the United States1. This sugar is increasingly being used as a sweetener in a variety of foods1. Because there is a limited absorptive capacity for fructose, excessive ingestion of fructose leads to fructose malabsorption and dietary fructose intolerance (DFI) 2-9, 13. Incomplete absorption of fructose may lead to a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms, including bloating, pain, gas and diarrhea 2-9. In tertiary care centers, the prevalence of DFI in subjects with unexplained GI symptoms has been estimated to range between 11-50 %, when subjects were assessed with breath tests following administration of 25 grams of fructose 2, 5-7.
Currently, the main treatment for DFI consists of restricting the intake of fructose-containing foods 10-12 or limiting the intake of foods with excess "free fructose" (ie, fructose in excess of glucose) or a high fructan content17. These diet restrictions can improve symptoms in patients with DFI 10-12,17. However, the diet is very restrictive and imposes a significant burden on the individual and the family. In one study, 40% of subjects were unable to comply with dietary restrictions 10. Currently, there are no other therapeutic agents for treating this condition 14, 15. Apart from promoting intestinal fructose absorption, an ideal therapeutic agent should be safe, simple to use, inexpensive and have no calorific value.
Fructose is mostly absorbed in the small intestine by facilitated diffusion which is mediated by the GLUT-5 transporter protein. This protein is expressed on the intestinal mucosal surface. In the presence of glucose, fructose absorption is increased, mostly due to co-transport with glucose via the GLUT-2 transporter protein. However, the calorie content of glucose precludes its routine use in patients with DFI. Other compounds that promote fructose absorption, such as 3 O-methyl glucose and epidermal growth factor (EGF) have significant side effects and safety issues, making them unsuitable for clinical use in DFI.
Several amino acids, including alanine, have been also been shown to increase intestinal fructose absorption 14. The postulated mechanism is as follows: transmucosal Na+-coupled amino acid transport causes increased water flow through the mucosal apical membrane14. This, in turn, facilitates fructose absorption by a process of 'solvent drag', caused by an increase in intraluminal fructose concentration caused by water removal from the lumen14. The potential benefit of alanine was assessed in a European study in healthy children 14. Ten subjects underwent H2 breath tests following administration of fructose alone (2g/ Kg body weight), followed by a combination of fructose and an equi-molar dose of various amino acids (L-alanine, L-phenylalanine, L-glutamine, L-proline) or glucose. Breath H2 production was assessed as a marker of intestinal fructose absorption. Subjects were asked to report any gastrointestinal symptoms during the test. All subjects had a positive (>20 ppm of H2) breath test (68 ± 38 ppm) with fructose and 6/10 subjects reported either abdominal pain or diarrhea during the test. Co-administration of alanine caused a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in breath H2 production (3 ± 3 ppm), suggesting increased intestinal fructose absorption. Furthermore, none of the subjects reported any gastrointestinal symptoms during the test.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
65 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Satish Rao, MD; Helen Smith
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal