ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Investigation of the Clinical Outcomes of Endocrowns Manufactured From Three Different Materials

G

Gulcan COSKUN AKAR

Status

Completed

Conditions

No Systemic Infection
Gingival Steps Should be at Gum Level
Gross Material Loss in Endodontically Treated Upper and Lower Molars

Treatments

Other: endocrowns

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06850649
E-61749811-000-1963653

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the durability of endocrowns, created using various materials and manufacturing techniques with a fully digital workflow, and their ability to maintain functionality and aesthetics in the oral cavity.

The main questions it aims to answer were does effect of different materials on clinical success?

Full description

Based on the power analysis, it was determined that restorations would be applied to 11 teeth in each of the three material groups (lithium-disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic, polymer infiltrated ceramic, and 3D-printed permanent hybrid resin) as well as the control group (n=11). A total of 33 teeth received endocrown restorations. Additionally, 11 patients were directly restored with composite resin in molar teeth with MOD cavities.

The digital impressions of the patients receiving endocrown restorations were recorded using an intraoral optical scanner and sent to a specialized dental laboratory. For two of the groups (lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramic, polymer infiltrated ceramic), restorations were fabricated using block milling, while for the third group (permanent hybrid resin), restorations were produced through 3D printing. The restorations were cemented adhesively. The restorations were evaluated using the Modified FDI and Modified USPHS criteria at baseline (0) and at the 6-month follow-up, and the data were subjected to statistical analysis.

At the 6-month evaluation, a statistically significant difference in color match was found between the groups based on the Modified FDI criteria, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed for any of the Modified USPHS criteria. All endocrowns produced with the three different materials survived and showed clinical success at the 6-month follow-up. Nevertheless, additional clinical studies with extended follow-up durations are required.

Enrollment

44 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be a lower or upper molar tooth
  • Must be periodontal healthy
  • There must be at least two axial walls in the relevant tooth
  • Gingival steps should be at gum level
  • There must be neighboring teeth mesial and distal to the relevant tooth.
  • The place where it occludes must be the opposing tooth and the tooth must be a natural or filled tooth without a prosthesis.
  • No systemic acut or chronic conditions (Thyroid disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Insulin dependent diabetes, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

  • Inadequate oral hygiene, bleeding on probing, pocket deeper than 3 mm mobility presence
  • Sensitivity to percussion after root canal treatment
  • Insufficient enamel tissue remaining in the relevant tooth
  • Presence of radiographically abnormal periodontal space
  • Teeth with inadequate bone support
  • Teeth with root resorption and fracture

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

44 participants in 1 patient group

Endocrown Materials
Experimental group
Description:
IPS Empress CAD Vita Enamic VarseoSmile Crown Plus
Treatment:
Other: endocrowns

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems