Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints worldwide and is an important health problem that restricts the daily life activities of individuals. In particular, chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) describes pain that persists for at least 12 weeks without an underlying specific pathological cause and affects a large segment of the population. CNSNP leads not only to pain but also to functional limitations, postural disorders and decreased quality of life.
In recent years, exercise-based approaches, especially core stabilisation exercises, have become prominent in the treatment of CNSNP. Core stabilisation exercises aim to increase postural control, improve segmental stability and thus reduce pain by activating deep muscle groups around the spine. However, it has been reported that exercises targeting only local muscle groups may be insufficient to meet the high-level biomechanical and neuromuscular needs of the cervical spine.
In this context, the effect of the mobility of the thoracic spine on neck function is noteworthy. Hypomobility in the thoracic region may contribute to pain and dysfunction by increasing the load on the cervical spine. Therefore, it is thought that adding thoracic mobilisation exercises to core stabilisation exercises may be more effective in improving neck pain and postural disorders.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding thoracic mobilisation to a core stabilisation exercise programme in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain.
Full description
Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems on a global scale and causes a significant decrease in the quality of life by negatively affecting the social, occupational and physical functionality of individuals. It is reported that approximately 30-50% of individuals experience neck pain every year and a significant proportion of these complaints become chronic. Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is defined as neck pain that persists for more than three months without an underlying anatomical or pathological cause and is the most common type of neck pain encountered in clinical practice. In the treatment of CNSNP, both symptom relief and correction of underlying mechanical disorders are important.
In rehabilitation programmes for neck pain, core stabilisation exercises are widely used to strengthen spinal stability and improve postural control by increasing activation of the deep muscles supporting the cervical and thoracic spine. The core consists of a large number of muscles and connective tissues surrounding the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine and the coordinated functioning of these structures is critical for the functional integrity of the spine. Various studies have shown that core stabilisation exercises are effective in reducing pain and increasing functional capacity.
However, the functional and mechanical health of the cervical spine is closely related not only to the local stabilising muscles but also to the mobility of the thoracic spine. Hypomobility of the thoracic spine can lead to increased compensatory motion in the cervical segments, muscle spasm, postural distortion and increased pain. There is increasing evidence in the literature that improving thoracic mobility can reduce cervical pain and dysfunction. In this context, integrating thoracic mobilisation exercises into core stabilisation programmes may provide not only symptomatic relief, but also better postural alignment and more effective functional recovery.
The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effects of adding thoracic mobilisation exercises to core stabilisation exercises in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. In this direction, it is aimed to evaluate the extent to which the applications for the mobility of the thoracic spine affect the clinical symptoms in the cervical region and to obtain data that will contribute to clinical rehabilitation programmes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
54 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal