ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Involving Communities in Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis: Making an IMPACT (Project IMPACT)

M

Morehouse School of Medicine

Status and phase

Enrolling
Phase 2

Conditions

Preconception Health

Treatments

Behavioral: SBIRT Intervention

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT05987059
MH-CIP Project IMPACT

Details and patient eligibility

About

With support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, The Center for Maternal Health Equity at Morehouse School of Medicine is conducting a research study to test the implementation of Pre-Pregnancy Counseling in community-based settings.

Full description

Severe racial disparities in pregnancy-related cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are preventable and warrant timely community-engaged action. Black women are 3 times more likely to die from a pregnancy-related cause, as compared to white women10 -in part, due to higher rates of cardiovascular risk during pregnancy. More than 80% of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable. Preconception counseling has been shown to improve maternal health for all women, with clear benefits to address cardiovascular risk factors of obesity, diabetes, hypertension. In order to have impact, evidence-based preconception counseling programs must be delivered through community settings that have a mission to reach at-risk populations of women. Healthy Start/community-based settings are appropriate for this, as they serve an at-risk population of Black women in many locations nationally. The investigators have engaged with Healthy Start and similar community-based settings in Georgia, South Carolina, to identify preconception counseling interventions that are evidence-based and feasible for their staff and community members. This community-engaged approach identified Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) interventions as feasible and acceptable to both staff and patients. In the pilot-test of their SBIRT model approach (Project IMPACT intervention), the investigators demonstrated capacity to screen for pregnancy risks and provide early intervention to n = 23 at-risk persons of reproductive age who wanted to get pregnant within the year. The investigators will build on their pilot work to conduct a hybrid effectiveness/implementation trial (type 2 hybrid) with n = 10 sites serving low-income African American men and women in Georgia, NC, SC, and TN. The investigators will use EPIS as an overarching framework to guide progress across the four phases (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment). In Aim 1 (EPIS Preparation phase), the investigators will work with their community partners to tailor the implementation strategy packages (Aim 1a) and their Project IMPACT intervention (Aim 1b) to the context of 10 sites across 4 states -- this tailoring will address contextual determinants of successful implementation from the Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). In Aim 2 (EPIS Implementation phase), we will test an Enhanced vs. Standard implementation strategy package of structured follow-up on the number of pre-conception counseling visits completed and will test any structured follow-up vs. no structured follow-up on readiness to change for key cardiovascular risk factors. In Aim 3 (EPIS Sustainment phase), the investigators will work with their community sites to co-develop an implementation and sustainment guide for the most effective strategy bundle from Aim 2. This work has potential to impact racial disparities in pregnancy-related morbidity/mortality and to advance our collective scientific understanding of the relative benefits of alternate implementation strategy packages.

Enrollment

850 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 44 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identify as Black/ African-American
  • Fluent English-Speaker
  • Not pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Own a phone
  • Receive services at the community-based site

Exclusion criteria

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Factorial Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

850 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard Structured Follow-Up
Experimental group
Description:
Emailed informational flyer(s) on prioritized cardiovascular risks and text messaging for logistical reasons. These will be in addition to the SBIRT intervention delivered by Healthy Start and other similar community organization staff that all participants will receive.
Treatment:
Behavioral: SBIRT Intervention
Enhanced Structured Follow-Up
Experimental group
Description:
Text or phone message(s) focused on the same prioritized risks + emailed informational flyer(s). These will be in addition to the SBIRT intervention delivered by Healthy Start and other similar community organization staff that all participants will receive.
Treatment:
Behavioral: SBIRT Intervention

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Madison Haiman, PhD; Adenike McDonald, MPH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems