Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this study was to compare early results of Total Hip Replacement (THR) in 2 groups of patients: with and without closed suction drainage (CSD). Patients were followed for 3 months post operatively.
Full description
After approval from the local ethical committee, patients undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) were included in this study. Patients with previous hip surgeries and coagulation disorders were not included. All patients were submitted to a non-cemented Total Hip Replacement (THR) through a Hardinge's approach. Before wound closure, a nurse opened an envelope containing the patient randomization: group 1 - with closed suction drainage (CSD) and group 2 - without closed suction drainage (CSD). In the group 1, a sub-fascial suction drain was used, and kept for 24 hours. Data collected included: mid-tigh circumference after 24 hours, blood transfusion, inflammatory blood markers C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and leucogram, Harris Hip Score (HHS) after 3 months, and complications. Patients were followed for 3 months post operatively.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
92 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal