ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Isomaltulose VS Sucrose - Postprandial Effect on Incretin Profile and Second Meal Effect

G

German Institute of Human Nutrition

Status

Completed

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Metabolic Syndrome

Treatments

Dietary Supplement: Intervention A
Dietary Supplement: Intervention B
Dietary Supplement: Intervention C
Dietary Supplement: Intervention D

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study evaluates the different postprandial effect of isomaltulose and sucrose on the incretin profile and as an determinant for the second meal effect.

In this nutritional intervention study, healthy participants and T2DM patients ingest 2 standardized meals for breakfast and lunch in combination with either sucrose or palatinose on 2 separate days. In addition, blood samples are taken to analyze markers of the carbohydrate metabolism, incretins and specific inflammation markers.

Full description

Isomaltulose is a natural occurring disaccharide with a similar structure to sucrose. It is composed of glucose and fructose, but is linked by an α-1,6-glycosidic bond instead of α-1,2. Due to its binding, isomaltulose is slowly hydrolysed, which results in a rather weak postprandial glycemic-insulinemic response, accompanied by a minimal GIP secretion and a stimulated secretion of GLP-1. In addition, several studies have shown that the intake of foods with a low glycemic index, such as isomaltulose, tend to improve the metabolic reaction to a subsequent meal. As the exact mechanism of this "second meal effect" is still unknown, the investigators hypothesize that the modified release and action of GIP and GLP-1 are key players in regard to the described effects.Therefore, isomaltulose could be a suitable tool for reducing the risk of developing diabetes, obesity and CVD as well as improve blood glucose control in people with diabetes.

In summary, this study evaluates the different postprandial effect of isomaltulose and sucrose on the incretin profile and as a determinant for the second meal effect.

In this nutritional intervention study, healthy participants and T2DM patients ingest 2 standardized meals for breakfast and lunch in combination with either sucrose or palatinose on 2 separated days. In addition, blood samples are taken to analyze markers of the carbohydrate metabolism, incretins and specific inflammation markers.

Enrollment

50 patients

Sex

All

Ages

45 to 75 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • for T2DM patients: insulin-independent

  • for healthy subjects: at least 1 component of the metabolic syndrom:

    • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²
    • Waist-hip ratio (WHR) ≥ 85 for women and ≥ 90 for men
    • hypertension
    • dyslipidemia
    • glucose / insulin intolerance

Exclusion criteria

  • medications: intake of medications which influence glucose metabolism
  • alcohol / drug abuse
  • physical diseases: endocrinological, malign, serious cardiovascular diseases
  • acute / chronic communicable disease
  • psychic diseases

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 4 patient groups

Intervention A
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nutritional intervention in healthy subjects and T2DM subjects: Accompanying a carbohydrate based breakfast, participants ingest either 50 g sucrose followed by a standardized lunch on 1 single day. In addition, blood samples are taken over 8 hours.
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Intervention A
Intervention B
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nutritional intervention in healthy subjects and T2DM subjects: Accompanying a carbohydrate based breakfast, participants ingest either 50 g palatinose followed by a standardized lunch on 1 single day. In addition, blood samples are taken over 8 hours.
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Intervention B
Intervention C
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nutritional intervention in healthy subjects: Accompanying a protein-based breakfast, participants ingest either 50 g sucrose followed by a standardized lunch on 1 single day. In addition, blood samples are taken over 8 hours.
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Intervention C
Intervention D
Active Comparator group
Description:
Nutritional intervention in healthy subjects: Accompanying a protein-based breakfast, participants ingest either 50 g isomaltulose followed by a standardized lunch on 1 single day. In addition, blood samples are taken over 8 hours.
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Intervention D

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems