ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses (PRMRP-Norms)

University of Iowa logo

University of Iowa

Status

Completed

Conditions

Healthy
Adult ALL

Treatments

Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04800510
CDMRP-PR172087 (Other Grant/Funding Number)
202002131

Details and patient eligibility

About

The proposed study evaluates the effect of carbon fiber brace design on forces across the ankle joint. It is expected that carbon fiber braces can be designed to reduce forces in the ankle. In this study, brace geometry will be varied to determine how these changes influence the forces experienced by ankle cartilage. The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses.

Full description

The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses.

Healthy adult participants will complete testing using three generic sized carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) and with no CDO. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A, CDO-B, or CDO-C. Testing will be completed under 4 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C, with each bracing condition (A/B/C) representing a CDO design variant. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that changes to device design do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without CDO use, satisfaction with the devices, perception of comfort and smoothness between devices, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using surface electromyography. Devices will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded.

The information obtained from this study will help refine the musculoskeletal model data input methods to be used in future studies. The knowledge that will be gained from this investigation has the potential to substantially improve the long-term efficacy and efficiency of the musculoskeletal model and help improve ankle foot orthosis

Enrollment

9 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18 and 50
  • Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 12
  • Healthy individuals without a current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, or medical or neuromusculoskeletal disorders that have limited participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months
  • Full active range of motion of the bilateral lower extremities and spine
  • Ability to hop without pain
  • Ability to perform a full squat without pain
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed moderate or severe brain injury
  • Prior lower extremity injury resulting in surgery or limiting function for greater than 6 weeks
  • Diagnosis of a physical or psychological condition that would preclude testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition)
  • Visual or hearing impairment that would interfere with instructions given during testing
  • Require an assistive device
  • Wounds to the foot or calf that would prevent CDO use
  • BMI greater than 35
  • Pregnancy - Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

9 participants in 6 patient groups

NoCDO, CDOA, CDOB, CDOC
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOA, then with CDOB, then with CDOC.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
NoCDO, CDOA, CDOC, CDOB
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOA, then with CDOC, then with CDOB.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
NoCDO, CDOB, CDOA, CDOC
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOB, then with CDOA, then with CDOC.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
NoCDO, CDOB, CDOC, CDOA
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOB, then with CDOC, then with CDOA.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
NoCDO, CDOC, CDOA, CDOB
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOC, then with CDOA, then with CDOB.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
NoCDO, CDOC, CDOB, CDOA
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO, then with CDOC, then with CDOB, then with CDOA.
Treatment:
Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems