Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) aim to increase success rates while minimizing patient risks. For women with high AFC or PCOS, conventional IVF carries a high risk of OHSS (Ho et al., 2019). A modern IVF strategy to prevent this uses a GnRH agonist trigger, requiring a "freeze-all" and subsequent FET (Wong et al., 2017). This reduces OHSS risk but can increase time to pregnancy (Vuong et al., 2021) and treatment burden.
IVM is a patient-friendly alternative that eliminates OHSS risk by avoiding high-dose gonadotropins. A 2020 trial by Vuong et al. compared CAPA-IVM-FET to conventional IVF-FET in women with high AFC. IVM yielded a comparable live birth rate (35.2%) versus IVF (43.2%), with a 0% OHSS rate in IVM compared to 0.7% in IVF (Vuong et al., 2020).
The optimal transfer method (fresh or frozen) in IVM cycles is debated. A 2021 pilot RCT by Vuong et al. found a freeze-only strategy after CAPA-IVM led to a significantly higher live birth rate (60%) than a fresh transfer (20%) (Vuong et al., 2021), but increased time to pregnancy (194 vs. 150 days) (Vuong et al., 2021). A refined CAPA-IVM protocol, which uses no gonadotropins, allowed for fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle, resulting in a numerically higher ongoing pregnancy rate (43.3% vs. 33.3%) than FET (Vuong et al., 2025).
This raises an important question: how does a simplified IVM strategy with fresh transfer compare to the established "safety-net" IVF strategy with FET? These two approaches represent opposing clinical philosophies. No large-scale study has yet compared them in women with PCOS. Therefore, this study is designed to compare the SAIGON protocol (gonadotropin-free CAPA-IVM with fresh ET) against a standard GnRH-antagonist IVF protocol with agonist trigger and subsequent FET.
Full description
Screening for eligibility and randomization: Women who are potentially eligible are provided with information about the trial. Screening is done on the day of the first visit, and patients are given informed consent form to sign before enrollment. Participants are then randomly assigned (1:1) to either the CAPA-IVM or IVF-FET group.
After randomisation 2.1. IVM-FRESH (The SAIGON Protocol):
2.2. IVF-FET (Frozen Transfer Protocol):
Pregnancy and outcomes:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
600 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Vu NA Ho, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal