Keeping Stable Inflammatory Arthritis Patients in Their Communities With the Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Status: Terminated

Conditions: Inflammatory Arthritis

Treatments: Other: Video Conferencing with Exteneded Role Practitioner (VC-ERP)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04249817

238-2019

Details and patient eligibility

About

In Ontario, rheumatology services are in short supply. Many people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) are traveling long distances for care and face geographical/ financial challenges in so doing. Travel burden may be decreased and satisfaction with care improved by integrating existing health care resources. A few rheumatologists in Ontario have adopted a video conferencing (VC) model for follow-up of stable IA patients using the Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN) with Extended Role Practitioners (ERPs) doing on-site assessments. Anecdotal evidence suggests this model benefits both patient and rheumatologist. We will determine how people with stable well-controlled IA, living more than 100 km round-trip from the rheumatology clinic, perceive quality of life before, during and after VC with ERP follow-up visits compared to usual care. Disease activity, functional status, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, and barriers to care will also be measured.

Full description

Rationale: To determine, using a mixed-methods design, the impact of a rheumatology appointment via video conferencing combined with on-site pre-assessment by an Advance Clinician Practioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-trained ERP compared to usual in-clinic care during a one-year period of follow-up for a cohort of persons with stable, well-controlled inflammatory arthritis residing in areas of low rheumatology supply.

Research Questions: For people with stable IA residing in areas of low rheumatology supply, is it feasible to provide follow-up to people with stable, well-controlled IA using videoconferencing and an assessment by an extended role practitioner? Does VC with ERP pre-assessment change quality of life and barriers to care perceived by people with stable, well-controlled IA?

Methods: Mixed-methods design. Randomized controlled trial with 2 groups: VC with ERP (VC-ERP) and usual care (UC). Pre- and Post-trial Interviews. Study procedures will be as follows:

1. Pre-trial Interview - 15 minute telephone interview that will be audio taped. Will take place no more than one month before baseline study visit. Participant will be asked about experience traveling to rheumatologist and barriers to receiving care closer to home.
2. Baseline visit - This visit will be a regularly scheduled appointment with the participant's rheumatologist. The participant will complete a package of four questionnaires and the rheumatologist will assess disease activity.
3. Randomization - after completion of the baseline visit, participants will be randomized either to VC-ERP or UC.
4. Follow-up Visits - There will be three follow-up visits 6, 12, and 13 months after the baseline study visit. Participants assigned to UC will be seen by their rheumatologist at the clinic as usual for all visits. At each visit, the participant wil complete a package of four questionnaires and the rheumatologist will assess disease activity. Participants assigned to VC-ERP will have their first two follow-up visits at an OTN site. There they will complete a package of four questionnaires, meet with the ERP for an assessment of disease activity, then connect with their rheumatologist by video conference. The final visit will take place in the rheumatologist's office, where the patient will complete a package of four questionnaires and the rheumatologist will assess disease activity.
5. Post-trial interview - 15 minute telephone interview that will be audio taped. Will take place no more than one month after final follow-up visit. Participants assigned to UC, will be asked the same questions as first interview. Participants assigned to VC-ERP, will be asked questions about their experience with the therapist and OTN during the study period

Significance: From perspective of people with stable, well-controlled IA, we will understand the barriers they perceive when travelling for rheumatology care far from their communities and whether this new model of care might help to mitigate some of that burden. This model already exists in Ontario and it's important to understand its value to people with stable IA and determine whether it is good use of an extended role practitioner's time.

Enrollment: 15 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• adults ≥18 years
• clinical diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis)
• inflammatory arthritis that is in remission or a low disease state as determined using a valid measure prior to study start
• travel to clinic ≥100 km round-trip
• able to read and write English
• willing/able to provide informed consent
• OHIP coverage.

Exclusion criteria

• Inflammatory arthritis that is neither in remission or in a low disease state as determined using a valid measure prior to study start
• complex rheumatic disease (i.e. lupus, vasculitis)
• travel to clinic <100 km round-trip
• children/youth < 18 years
• unable to read and write English
• unwilling/unable to provide informed consent
• no OHIP coverage.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Health Services Research

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

15 participants in 2 patient groups

Video conferencing with extended role practitioner

Experimental group

Description:

Participant goes to Ontario Telemedicine site for follow-up. At site, participant will get a physical assessment by an extended role practitioner and then will connect to their rheumatologist by videoconferencing for completion of follow-up.

Treatment:

Other: Video Conferencing with Exteneded Role Practitioner (VC-ERP)

Usual care

No Intervention group

Description:

Participant goes to their rheumatologist's clinic for follow-up, including physical assessment by their rheumatologist, as they would normally.