Kinetics, Efficacy and Safety of C1-Esteraseremmer-N

Prothya Biosolutions

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 2

Conditions: Hereditary Angioedema Type I; Angioneurotic Edema

Treatments: Drug: C1 inhibitor concentrate

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Industry

Identifiers

NCT00119431

KB2003.01A

Details and patient eligibility

About

A multicentre study to investigate pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of nanofiltered Cetor® (called C1-esteraseremmer-N during the development phase) for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) will be performed. This study KB2003.01 consists of three parts, part A pharmacokinetics (phase II), part B treatment of attacks of angioedema (phase III) and part C prophylactic use of C1 inhibitor (phase III). Part B + C will provide data on the efficacy of C1-esteraseremmer-N.

The changes in the manufacturing process of C1-esteraseremmer-N, compared to Cetor® (the currently marketed C1-inhibitor product), nanofiltration and omission of hepatitis B immunoglobulin, most likely will not affect tolerability. The nanofiltration will provide more safety regarding viruses.

In part A, the pharmacokinetics of C1-esteraseremmer-N in patients with hereditary angioedema will be compared with the current registered product, Cetor®, in a randomised, blinded cross-over design. This study has to provide evidence that changes in the manufacturing process have not affected pharmacokinetics. In addition, this study provides data on safety of C1-esteraseremmer-N.

Full description

A multicentre study to investigate pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of nanofiltered Cetor® (called C1-esteraseremmer-N during the development phase) for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) will be performed. This study KB2003.01 consists of three parts, part A pharmacokinetics (phase II), part B treatment of attacks of angioedema (phase III) and part C prophylactic use of C1 inhibitor (phase III). Part B + C will provide data on the efficacy of C1-esteraseremmer-N.

The changes in the manufacturing process of C1-esteraseremmer-N, compared to Cetor® (the currently marketed C1-inhibitor product), nanofiltration and omission of hepatitis B immunoglobulin, most likely will not affect tolerability. The nanofiltration will provide more safety regarding viruses.

In part A, the pharmacokinetics of C1-esteraseremmer-N in patients with hereditary angioedema will be compared with the current registered product, Cetor®, in a randomised, blinded cross-over design. This study has to provide evidence that changes in the manufacturing process have not affected pharmacokinetics. In addition, this study provides data on safety of C1-esteraseremmer-N. Twelve HAE patients without signs of an attack will receive an administration of 1,000 U, 1,500 U or 2,000 U of C1-esteraseremmer-N or Cetor® and later on the same dose of the other product. Both antigenic and functional C1 inhibitor levels will be determined. Laboratory safety parameters and adverse events will be monitored as well

Enrollment: 12 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Established diagnosis of hereditary angioedema type I: i.e. markedly decreased C1 inhibitor activity, decreased level of C1 inhibitor antigen and a decreased level of C4.
• Age ≥ 18 years
• Body weight between 40 and 100 kg.
• Signed Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• C1 inhibitor infusion within the last 7 days
• Signs of any attack
• Angioedema attack within 7 days before actual infusion of study medication
• Change in the dosage of androgens in the last 14 days before the study
• Change in oral anticonceptive medication in the last two months before the study
• Pregnancy or lactation.
• B-cell malignancy
• Participation in another pharmaceutical clinical study, which can interfere with this study, in the last 3 months prior to the study
• History of clinically relevant antibody development to C1 inhibitor
• Use of oral anticoagulant medication in the last 14 days
• Use of heparin within the last two days prior to the study
• History of allergic reaction to C1 inhibitor concentrate or other blood products

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Crossover Assignment

Masking: Double Blind