ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Language During Inhalational Induction

Boston Children's Hospital logo

Boston Children's Hospital

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
Emergence Delirium

Treatments

Behavioral: Standard/common language during induction
Behavioral: Positive language during induction

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06324955
IRB-P00042507

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to compare the impact of common (standard of care) language vs positive language used by clinicians during inhalational induction of anesthesia on anxiety and negative behaviors in children. This is a prospective randomized parallel group trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the common/standard language group or the positive language group.

Enrollment

128 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

5 to 10 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA 1 and 2 (Healthy Patients)
  • Non-emergent cases
  • 5-10 year olds
  • Patients receiving inhalational induction

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-English speaking
  • History of prior inhalational inductions
  • Hearing difficulty
  • Behavioral difficulty (Autism, Oppositional Defiant Disorder)
  • Patients receiving premedication other than midazolam

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

128 participants in 2 patient groups

Common/Standard Language Group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Standard/common language during induction
Positive Language Group
Experimental group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Positive language during induction

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

John Fiadjoe, MD; Rachel Bernier, MPH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems