Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children

Al-Azhar University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Rectal Prolapse

Treatments: Device: Laparoscopy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04117633

Azh-Ped-Surg-70712018

Details and patient eligibility

About

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:

Full description

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group

Enrollment: 64 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 5 to 12 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Children with persistant complete Rectal Prolapse.

• Failure of conservative treatment.
• more than 2 attacks of prolapse requiring manual reduction.

Exclusion criteria

• Sever constipation
• Previous abdominal or pelvic surgery with extensive adhesions.
• Cases older than 12ys,
• Patients with rectal polyp

Trial design

Primary purpose: Supportive Care

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

64 participants in 2 patient groups

Mesh Rectopexy

Active Comparator group

Description:

Using Laparoscopy

Treatment:

Device: Laparoscopy

Suture Rectopexy

Active Comparator group

Description:

Using Laparoscopy

Treatment:

Device: Laparoscopy