ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-through Versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty

A

Assiut University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Anorectal Malformation

Treatments

Device: laparoscopic pull-through

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Anorectal malformations are congenital malformations, in which the terminal part of the hindgut is abnormally placed and lies outside (partially or completely) the sphincter mechanism.

Full description

The incidence of anorectal malformation ~1 in 5,000 More common in Down's syndrome and Cat-eye syndrome. Male >female (60:40).It is classified into many types according to the degree of descent of the rectal pouch in the pelvis, the fistula between the rectum and the urinary system in males and genital system in females. The most common type in males is high anorectal malformation with rectourethral fistula

There are many historical operations for the management of the high type, but the most popular operation now is the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty which was published for the first time in 1982. Children undergoing posterior sagittal anorectoplasty may have lifelong bowel management problems of constipation, incontinence, and encopresis.

After the introduction of laparoscopy in pediatric surgery, many surgeons hope that the use of laparoscopy instead of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty may reduce the complications of the complications of the big incision and disturbance of sphincter mechanism which occur in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty operation. In addition to its role in diagnosis in complex anomalies like cloaca which is well established now. So the question is to what extent can the laparoscopy replace usual surgery for anorectal malformation.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

6 months to 3 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

-all male and female childs aged from 6 months to the age of 3 years, in assiut university hospital, who have been diagnosed to have high anorectal malformation since birth and for whom colostomy was done

Exclusion criteria

  • all cases with low anomalies will be excluded.
  • Female child with vestibular anus
  • case with short distal pouch

Trial design

Primary purpose

Device Feasibility

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

laparoscopic group
Active Comparator group
Description:
laparoscopic pull-through
Treatment:
Device: laparoscopic pull-through
posterior sagittal group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
Treatment:
Device: laparoscopic pull-through

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems