Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This prospective randomized study will evaluate the effectiveness of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) versus endotracheal intubation (ETT) for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia at CMH.
Full description
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness during general anesthesia of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. There are limited pediatric literature evaluating the use of laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic procedures compared with traditional endotracheal intubation. This study aims to add to this literature in providing information comparing the two techniques. The rationale for this study is to show that general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway is an effective and non-inferior technique compared with general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and may offer benefits in terms of efficiency of care and respiratory complications.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
62 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Tolulope Oyetunji, MD; Emily Weisberg, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal