ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Laryngoscopy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (VL)

K

Konya Meram State Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Videolaryngoscopy

Treatments

Other: Tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscopy
Other: Tracheal intubation using Storz VL
Other: Tracheal intubation using EzVision VL
Other: Tracheal intubation using MacGrath VL

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare Macintosh laryngoscope, EzVision® video laryngoscope, McGrath® video laryngoscope and Storz® video laryngoscope in terms of hemodynamic response associated with intubation in adult patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG).

Full description

During endotracheal intubation, laryngoscopy can significantly affect hemodynamic responses, including tachycardia and elevated blood pressure, which may be particularly detrimental to individuals with cardiovascular conditions. Various studies have explored the hemodynamic reactions associated with laryngeal stimulation through different intubation devices. Researchers hypothesize that endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy will elicit a reduced hemodynamic response compared to traditional (Macintosh) laryngoscopy. In this prospective and randomized clinical study, the purpose is to compare the Macintosh laryngoscope, EzVision® video laryngoscope, McGrath® video laryngoscope and Storz® video laryngoscope concerning haemodynamic response associated with intubation in adult patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG).

Enrollment

112 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range between 18 and 75 years.
  • Scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery.
  • Classified under American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III.
  • Patients with no history of difficult intubation or associated risk factors.

Exclusion criteria

  • Emergency case
  • Predicted difficult airways
  • Body mass index > 35 kilograms per meter squared
  • Baseline hemodynamic instability

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

112 participants in 4 patient groups

Group Storz VL
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients will undergo intubation with the Storz Videolaryngoscope®, during which their hemodynamic responses will be documented.
Treatment:
Other: Tracheal intubation using Storz VL
Group MacGrath VL
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients will undergo intubation with the McGrath Videolaryngoscope®, during which their hemodynamic responses will be documented.
Treatment:
Other: Tracheal intubation using MacGrath VL
Group EzVision VL
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients will undergo intubation with the EzVision Videolaryngoscope®, during which their hemodynamic responses will be documented.
Treatment:
Other: Tracheal intubation using EzVision VL
Group Traditional
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients will undergo intubation with the traditional (Macintosh) laryngoscopy, during which their hemodynamic responses will be documented.
Treatment:
Other: Tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscopy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

BETUL KOZANHAN, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems