Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. This can lead to painful and costly clinical sequelae such as foot ulcers, amputation, and neuropathic pain. There are several novel diagnostic methods available for complementary to clinical assessment and may help in the early detection of DPN. However, treatments for DPN and painful DPN are limited.
We will conduct a pilot, single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients with DPN to verify the effect of the laser acupuncture on DPN. With designed inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 eligible participants will be randomized with 1:1 allocation ratio to the following two groups:(1) the laser acupuncture group (N=15), (2) the sham laser acupuncture group (N=15). Each participant will receive 24 interventions within 8 weeks, three times per week. Participants follow the laser acupuncture protocol in our study. All participants will be clinically assessed by (1) Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), (2) questionnaires (BPI(SF)-DPN) for diabetic neuropathic pain assessment, and (3) nerve conduction test.
This research project will validate our novel preliminary findings demonstrating neuroprotective effects of laser acupuncture treatment. Importantly, our data are expected to elucidate how laser acupuncture induces neuroprotection in the clinical setting and provide a scientific base for developing new approaches in the treatment of DPN.
Full description
This prospective, randomized, single-center, parallel-group study will be cooperatively conducted in the neurology and traditional Chinese medicine department of Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University in Tainan, Taiwan. Study approval will be applied from the TMANH Research Ethics Committee. After screening eligibility and completing baseline assessments, we obtained informed consent from all patients before enrollment. Participants were randomized to either the laser acupuncture, the sham laser acupuncture group using a block randomization method with allocation ratio of 1:1(Figure 7). Before study commencement, the statistician created a randomization sequence using IBM® SPSS® Statistics and contained it in sealed envelopes. The balanced sample size was ensured by dividing the participants into blocks of two. All eligible participants and assessors were unaware of the assignment order. Both the physician and participants will be unaware of the group allocation. Participants were allowed to withdraw from the study at any time.
• Patient eligibility
We included the patients with the following inclusion criteria(Dietzel, et al. 2021):
The main exclusion criteria for the patients are as follows:
According to the previous randomization assignment, each patient will be assigned to 2 groups: (1) the laser acupuncture group and (2) the sham laser acupuncture group. Only the statistician aware of the randomized order for each participant. Each participant will receive 24 interventions within 8 weeks, including three interventions per week for 8 weeks. The selected acupoints for laser acupuncture and electro-acupuncture were the same real acupoints, including bilateral LI 4, PC6, LI11, GB 34, ST 36, SP 6, KI 3, LR 3。
• Statistical analysis All data will be analyzed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 22 (Statistical Product and Service Solutions Statistics, I.B.M., Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). For demographic data, continuous data will be analyzed using a two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical data will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test. If the data of each group fail to pass the Shapiro-Wilk normal distribution test (all p value < 0.05), the between-group differences will be examined using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, and the intra-group differences will be examined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. If the measurements of the baseline values will be as per the Shapiro-Wilk normal distribution test (all p value > 0.05), the difference between groups will be examined using a two-sample t-test, and the intra-group difference was examined using a paired t-test. Differences between or within groups were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
30 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Yu Chen Chiu, MD; Chien-Chen Huang, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal