Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy in Second and Third Degree Piles

Assiut University

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Hemorrhoids

Treatments: Procedure: open surgical hemorrhoidectomy; Procedure: laser hemorrhoidoplasty

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05770141

laser hemorrhoidoplasty

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study aims to compare the pain , duration of intervention and long term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open surgical hemorrhoidectomy

Full description

Hemorrhoidal disease is ranked first among diseases of the rectum and large intestine, and the estimated worldwide prevalence ranges from 2.9% to 27.9%, of which more than 4% are symptomatic .

Age distribution demonstrates a Gaussian distribution with a peak incidence between 45 and 65 years with subsequent decline after 65 years .Men are more frequently affected than women .

The anorectal vascular cushions along with the internal anal sphincter are essential in the maintenance of continence by providing soft tissue support and keeping the anal canal closed tightly. Hemorrhoids are considered to be due to the downward displacement of suspensory (Treitz) muscle .

There are many treatments of hemorrhoids varying from medications and band ligation to stapled hemorrhoidopexy, laser photocoagulation, sclerotherapy, Doppler-guided artery ligation, and finally surgery .

The indications for the surgical treatment include the presence of a significant external component, hypertrophied papillae, associated fissure, extensive thrombosis or recurrence of symptoms after repeated RBL. The technique employed may be open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson) .

Post hemorrhoidectomy pain is the commonest problem associated with the surgical techniques. The other early complications are urinary retention (20.1%), bleeding (secondary or reactionary) (2.4%-6%) and subcutaneous abscess (0.5%). The long-term complications include anal fissure (1% -2.6%), anal stenosis (1%), incontinence (0.4%), fistula (0.5%) and recurrence of hemorrhoids .

The study aims to compare the pain , duration time of intervention and long term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open surgical hemorrhoidectomy

Enrollment: 40 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 16+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• II-III hemorrhoidal disease
• failure of conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

• grade IV
• acutely thrombosed haemorrhoids
• patients affected by IBD involving rectum or anus
• patients previously surgically treated for hemorrhoidal disease and the inability to complete study protocol

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

40 participants in 2 patient groups

LHP GROUP

Other group

Description:

patients received Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty procedure

Treatment:

Procedure: laser hemorrhoidoplasty

MM GROUP

Other group

Description:

patients received conventional open surgical hemorrhoidectomy

Treatment:

Procedure: open surgical hemorrhoidectomy