Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This is a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial to determine if the Layperson Audiovisual Assist tourniquet's (LAVA TQ) ability to occlude arterial blood flow is non-inferior to that of the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT).
Full description
Background and Significance
Trauma is the leading cause of death in the United States for people ages 1 to 44; uncontrolled bleeding is a leading cause of those deaths.1 Immediate hemorrhage control, even prior to the arrival of emergency medical services, can save lives during these emergencies. Since the launch of the Stop the Bleed (STB) campaign in 2015, the public has been empowered to stop life-threatening hemorrhage.2 One of STB's five objectives is to equip every bleeding control kit with audio and visual instructions; this has not yet been achieved. Commonly used tourniquets, such as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) or Special Operations Forces Tourniquet (SOF-T), do not provide audio instructions and are not designed to provide feedback to facilitate tourniquet application. A device that could facilitate application and provide real-time instructions and feedback could be immensely beneficial to both the public and the DoD, especially to minimally or untrained people such as DoD civilians, contractors, and dependents on military installations. To achieve the above mentioned STB's objective, the research team at the National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health is devoted to develop a layperson tourniquet with audio-visual instructions and performance feedback.
In January 2020, the research team conducted a pilot study to evaluate this novel layperson tourniquet in a community lay public sample recruited from at the NBC Health Expo in Washington, DC. Findings of this pilot study were promising. One highlight of the results was that the proportion of participants who applied the tourniquet correctly using the layperson tourniquet was significantly higher than that using the CAT (93.3% versus 6.3%). Moreover, for when asked about their favoritism toward the tourniquet, 93.3% favored the novel layperson tourniquet, whereas 68.8% favored the CAT.
In addition to research results, feedback provided by the participants in this pilot study allowed the research team and the manufacturing partner to make adjustments and improvements to the testing device. Now we have completed a pilot study evaluating overall user experience of the novel layperson tourniquet, our next step is to conduct a functionality study examining the function of this novel layperson tourniquet and to see if it performs on par with the CAT.
Objectives/Specific Aims/Research Questions
The objective of the study is to determine if the Layperson Audiovisual Assist Tourniquet (LAVA TQ)'s ability to occlude arterial blood flow is non-inferior to a Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT).
Study Procedures
This study will be a single blinded, randomized clinical trial. The study will be conducted in a room at USU's Multidisciplinary Laboratories.
The study has two arms: SMART TQ is the experimental arm and CAT is the control arm. The study will consist of three groups of individuals:
We will recruit two medical professionals and two blinded observers and consent volunteers (i.e., participants).
Two medical professionals will attend a training session prior to the study. The session will allow the study team to verify that medical professionals can apply both types of tourniquets successfully. We anticipate this training session lasting no more than one hour and will recruit one participant for the training session.
Upon the completion of the informed consent, participants will be assigned study ID numbers. The study steps are below:
The procedures will then be repeated to a participant's other leg for the other arm. For example, if a participant is initially assigned to the CAT and uses the right leg for tourniquet application. The participant will then be in the LAVA TQ arm for the left leg.
Termination Procedures: For the first tourniquet application on each leg, the observer will use doppler ultrasound to assess the participant's foot for a present or absent dorsalis pedis pulse. The observer will make the assessment at the location previously marked with a surgical marker. As soon as the pulse is determined to be present or absent, the observer will verbally tell the medical professional, "remove the tourniquet now."
For the second tourniquet application on each leg, the medical professional will tighten the tourniquet on top of the neonatal blood pressure cuff as described. The study team member will record the pressure. As soon as the pressure is noted, the study team member will tell the medical professional, "remove the tourniquet now."
Participant Post-Application Assessment: Following the application of two tourniquets to both legs, the study team will ask the participant to rest while lying on the table for five minutes. After five minutes, the study team member will ask the participant the following questions:
If the answer is yes to any question, the team member will ask the participant to rest for five more minutes and re-ask the questions. If the answer to any question is still yes, the study team member will recommend that the participant seek medical care at an emergency department or with the participant's physician. If the study team member or participant is concerned that they are experiencing a medical emergency, they will call 9-1-1 and alert any of the medical professionals assisting with the study for assistance.
If the answer to the questions is no, the study team member will ask the participant to walk up and down the hall in the MDL. The study team member will observe the participant ambulating. If the person feels normal while walking, they can be discharged from the study.
The study team member will be advised to follow-up with their physician or emergency department for medical care if either leg develops worsening pain, swelling, redness, coldness, or bluish or pale color, or if they have shortness of breath or chest pain. The study team member will advise the participant that some mild local bruising or redness in the area of the tourniquet application may occur and that it does not require medical evaluation.
In addition, given the LAVA TQ is an abbreviated investigational device, we will follow the abbreviation requirements specified by the FDA.
Data Collection
The outcome variables in the study are: 1. the participants' resting blood pressure, 2.
the presence or absence of dorsalis pedis pulse after tourniquet application, and 3. the surface pressure reading when the tourniquet is tightened. At the beginning of the study, participants will be asked to complete a demographic information sheet. On this sheet, they will fill out their age, gender, race, and ethnicity.
Statistical Considerations
The primary outcome variable for this research study binary (successfully stop the pulse: yes/no) and we conducted a power analysis for a parallel group non-inferiority trial. Assuming the two arms have the same high successful rate, with 80% power, and define the non-inferiority limit as 10% (so that a difference bigger than this would matter in practice), we estimated sample size required for each group is 13 applications (at least), so a total sample size of 26 applications (at least). Given the potential missing data and to ensure we will have enough statistical power for the final analyses, we will set the total sample size of 40 applications for this study. Since the tourniquet will be applied to participants' both legs (not at the same time), each leg will be one application and one participant will be able to fulfill two applications. As such, we will recruit no more than 20 participants for the study session and one additional participant for the training session.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal