Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this study is to investigate the equivalence in early and long-term efficacy between the two "Leave nothing behind strategies" (Drug-Coated Baloon [DCB] strategy with bail-out BioResorbable Scaffold [BRS] versus BRS strategy) of de-novo native coronary artery lesions in a relatively young Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) population, to be more specific, Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) (Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction [NSTEMI] and Unstable angina) between 18-68 years of age scheduled for PCI. The main questions aim to answer are:
DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has noninferior angiographic in-segment net gain at 13 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 60 months compared to BRS strategy?
Participants will be followed at:
Full description
The Leave Nothing Behind Study is an is an investigator-initiated trial. The Primary efficacy endpoint is target-vessel failure (TVF), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Co-primary efficacy endpoint (angiographic substudy) is the in-segment net gain at 13 months.
Investigators aim to enroll 2256 patients in the main study and 196 patients in the angiographic substudy.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
2,256 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
CERC France; DAVIDE CAPODANNO, Professor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal