Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
In this randomized study dealing with the ablative treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation, two ablation strategies are compared: a more anatomically guided linear ablation scheme versus an electrophysiological guided focal ablation strategy aiming at the electrical isolating of the pulmonary veins and ablating areas of fragmented intracardiac electrograms thought to maintain atrial fibrillation.
Full description
This randomized study deals with two different ablative treatment strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a more anatomically guided linear ablation scheme with encircling of the ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PV), a left atrial roof line and an anterior line bridging the anterior mitral anulus to the ostium of the left superior PV versus an electrophysiological guided focal ablation strategy aiming at isolating, electrically, the PV and ablating areas of fragmented intracardiac electrograms thought to maintain atrial fibrillation.
Both ablation approaches contain isolation of the most common source of triggering foci, i.e., the pulmonary veins and additional modification of the substrate maintaining atrial fibrillation.
The study endpoint is a combined efficacy/safety analysis. Extensive follow-up with three-monthly 7 days holter ECG is provided.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
116 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Heidi Estner, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal