Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.
Full description
Background: Although LISA offers some advantages in ventilation procedure and neonatal outcomes over INSURE, the use of a catheter during LISA may have some drawbacks such as the prolonged duration of the laryngoscopy needed to insert the device. This is likely to aggravate the invasiveness of the procedure, resulting in stressful consequences such as bradycardia, hypoxia and hemodynamic changes.
Objectives: i) time of device positioning, ii) success of the procedure of positioning the device, iii) participant's satisfaction.
Methods: This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
42 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal