ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

LLLT for BCRL: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Breast Cancer Lymphedema

Treatments

Device: Conventional low-level laser therapy
Device: Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05725265
202210064DIPD

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema. The change of severity of BCRL will be measured by the difference of circumference and skin thickness, detected by ultrasound. The influence on clinical symptoms, such as pain, shoulder mobility and hand function, are also investigated in the study.

Full description

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is common complication after cancer treatment. The incidence of BCRL around is 16.6% (95% CI 13·6-20·2) after the diagnosis and higher among the group receiving the sentinel biopsy or axillary lymph dissection. The lymphedema arises from the accumulation of protein-rich lymph fluid in the interstitial spaces then results in chronic inflammation with symptoms of fibrosis, pain, limited range of motion or paresthesia. The BRCL is chronic and progressive condition, and the severity also changes over time. The definition and cut points of BCRL using inter-limb volume or arm circumference varied across the studies by different measure method. Currently, the International Society of Lymphology suggests calculating arm volume from circumferences through the truncated cone formula to qualify the severity. On the other hand, previous research found the skin and subcutis were thickened in the ipsilateral arm of patients with BCRL. Thus, the measurement of skin thickness using ultrasound may also practical to detect the progression of lymphedema. Except for physical change of upper limb, the symptoms of BCRL are also concerned. One of the most common morbidity is pain, mostly presenting 1 month after surgery (56.6%). Furthermore, BCRL might decrease shoulder range of motion. Previous study demonstrated that shoulder mobility was usually restricted at 1 month postoperatively and abduction and forward flexion were limited at first. Thus, functional disability may occurred and life of quality may be influenced. To evaluate the ability to perform functional activities, the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) is an useful tool to assess the patients with BCRL.

Currently, although complete decongestive therapy (CDT) has been the standard therapy, there is still various type of noninvasive treatment on BCRL, for example, low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also named photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), is a conservative therapy through utilizing wave lengths of red or near infrared light between 650 and 1000 nm to stimulate wound healing and reduce inflammation, edema, and pain. Moreover, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the LLLT for treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema in November 2006. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of LLLT on BCRL with comparison to physical therapy or placebo. However, there is still limited data about the LLLT with different light area on improvement of severity and symptoms of BCRL. Therefore, this study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema.

Enrollment

54 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

20+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Female subjects, 20 years age or older, suffered from unilateral breast cancer with ipsilateral lumpectomy or mastectomy and lymph node dissection (sentinel biopsy or axillary dissection)
  • Stage I or II unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema(as defined by the International Society of Lymphology)
  • Girth≥ 2 cm circumferential difference compared with the uninvolved upper extremity at any 4 cm segment
  • Able to commit to a long-term follow-up schedule

Exclusion criteria

  • Metastatic cancer(stage IV)
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of other extremity lymphedema (primary or secondary)
  • History of deep vein thrombosis
  • Pacemaker
  • Artificial joints, implant or tattoo(area≥4 cm2) at the involved upper extremity
  • Previous treatment with low-level laser therapy (within 3 months)
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35 (morbid obesity)
  • High bleeding tendency(hemophilia)
  • Receiving long-term steroid treatment (oral or systemic)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

54 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Large-area low-level laser therapy
Experimental group
Description:
Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) was administered at proximal forearm, upper arm and axillary region of affected side. The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.
Treatment:
Device: Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)
Conventional low-level laser therapy
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Conventional low-level laser therapy was administrated on antecubital fossa and the axilla of affected side. The wavelength was 808nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.
Treatment:
Device: Conventional low-level laser therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ying-Chun Chen, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems