Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
See: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05402150
Relevant for this Paper:
This investigation aims to evaluate the stability of the effectiveness of different two-week online interventions in a four months follow-up regarding reward sensitivity, anhedonia and depression.
The authors will further investigate factors influencing treatment success regarding reward sensitivity. The investigators assume that the more depressive expectations and stress improve during our online intervention, the more change in reward insensitivity is experienced at follow-up. In addition, it is hypothesized that the more people engaged in physical activities and social encounters during the two-week online intervention, the more change in reward insensitivity is experienced at follow-up.
Full description
See for main study: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05402150.
A possible maintaining role in depressive symptoms plays reward hyposensitivity. Therefore, treatments should include evidence-based psychological interventions that target and modify reward insensitivity. Prior research lacks studies investigating reward sensitivity as main outcome measure, especially in the web-based format. This is why this study investigated an online intervention with the following groups regarding effectively increasing reward sensitivity compared to a waitlist control condition:
a) mindfulness-based interventions, b) behavioral activation, c) a combination of both.
The daily exercises were supported via videos and worksheets. Here, the investigators explore the effects after a four-months follow-up. In addition, this paper will deal with the long-term prediction of reward sensitivity, a feature not considered in our main paper preregistered with the ID NCT05402150. Factors, which are considered to play a big role in reward sensitivity are perceived stress, depressive expectations, physical activity and the frequency of social encounters.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
224 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal