Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether the protection afforded by Epaxal vaccine co-administered with diphtheria, tetanus, Bordetella pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and inactivated polio vaccine(DTPaHibIPV), oral polio vaccine (OPV) and (measles mumps and rubella) MMR vaccines against hepatitis A was not inferior to the protection afforded by Epaxal administered alone. The aim of the follow-up phase is to obtain information on the long term protection afforded by Epaxal, and to compare this with an alternative hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Original study:
Follow-up phase:
Exclusion criteria
Original study:
Follow-up phase:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
327 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal