Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of the study is the long-term implementation of a system with quality of life diagnosis and tailored therapeutic options in order to improve quality of life of patients with breast cancer during follow-up.
Full description
The implementation of quality of life (QoL) concepts in routine care is still an open matter. A pathway with QoL diagnosis and therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer has been designed, implemented, and evaluated as guided by the Medical Research Council framework for developing and testing complex interventions. It could be demonstrated that patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer profited from the diagnosis of QoL deficits and tailored therapeutic options in their treatment.
The next step is the long-term implementation of the QoL pathway into routine care. In a prospective, single-arm study 200 patients with breast cancer are planned to be recruited. QoL is measured (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) after surgery (baseline) and during aftercare (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months). Results of QoL measurements are automatically processed via an electronic data processing (EDP)-aided system and are directly presented to the coordinating practitioner (physician who cares for the patient during aftercare) and the patient in a QoL profile that can be discussed during the current medical appointment. The profile consists of eleven dimensions on scales of 0-100. A cutoff score <50 points defines a need for QoL therapy. Specific therapeutic options for the treatment of QoL have been identified: psychotherapy, social counseling, pain therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition counseling, and fitness. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for each therapy option have been founded. Coordinating practitioners receive a list with addresses of all quality circle members.
The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of patients with a need for QoL therapy 6 months after surgery as well as the evaluation of clinical relevance of the QoL pathway by patients and physicians.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
56 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal