Status
Conditions
About
Low energy availability (LEA) signifies a condition where the body lacks sufficient energy to support essential physiological functions crucial for maintaining optimal health (1). This energy insufficiency can be exacerbated by the demands of sports and exercise, resulting in negative impacts on various physiological, psychological, and sports performance (11, 8, 2). While LEA is commonly associated with cardiovascular abnormalities, such as early atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, and lower blood pressure, the existing body of research faces limitations, including small sample sizes and primarily exploratory approaches (2). Additionally, despite a growing body of evidence suggesting a strong link between DNA methylation (an epigenetic modification influencing gene expression by tagging specific parts of the DNA code) and cardiovascular disease (9, 6), there has been no prior investigation exploring the interplay between DNA methylation, cardiovascular disease, and LEA. To better understand LEA and its effects on cardiovascular health, it is imperative to address these limitations through further research. Utilising more comprehensive markers of cardiovascular disease and expanding the scope of investigations will contribute to a great understanding of LEA and its implications on cardiovascular health (10).
Full description
The team plans to include 126 trained to elite female athletes from local sports clubs near the Liverpool area to participate in the study.
Following ethical approval and informed consent from the participants, data will be collected during a one-time visit at Liverpool Hope University in one of the laboratories in the Health Science building.
Following a single laboratory visit, the following will be collected:
In addition, metabolomic analysis, lipoprotein subclass analysis and methylation analysis on blood cells will be performed.
Machine learning models will also be used to detect novel patterns of lipids/metabolites in the data. Multivariate analysis will be performed before the machine learning models.
Two groups will be formed, comprising one group identified as a high LEA risk group and the other as a low LEA risk group. LEA risk status will be established via the Loukes et al. (1999) equation: Energy availability = (Energy intake (kJ) - Energy expenditure during exercise (kJ))/fat-free mass (kg) (5). Group allocation of participants will be based on the following classification: Low risk of LEA High: EA ≥45 kcal/kg LBM/d and high risk of LEA EA 30 kcal/kg LBM/d (3).
To reduce the variability among the participant results concerning their menstrual cycle characteristics, all 126 selected volunteers will engage in a two-month menstrual cycle monitoring process before the testing for the main research study, following the methodological recommendations for female athlete research (7). This monitoring will occur in participants' homes, utilising menstrual cycle tracking apps and ovulation testing kits that will be sent to them. To track menstrual cycles, volunteers will use a menstrual cycle tracking app to record the first and last day of menstruation for each cycle. Daily ovulation tests will also be conducted using urine to detect the mid-cycle surge in luteinising hormone. The occurrence of the mid-cycle surge in luteinizing hormone will be documented in the app, providing visual confirmation to the researcher. This will also serve as crucial information to identify each participant specific menstrual cycle phases.
To ensure consistent testing, the research team will schedule all participants' tests for the main project during their early luteal phase, specifically in phase three. This phase captures a medium oestrogen concentration while keeping progesterone levels low, confirmed by a positive luteinizing hormone surge captured by the ovulation kit. This strategic choice is made to measure hormone levels within a normal range for health assessment, making it easier to identify any potential hormonal imbalances not due to the typical hormonal fluctuations linked with different phases of the menstrual cycle. This approach ensures precise timing aligned with specific menstrual phases that help minimise the impact of cycle-related variations to enhance the main study's results reliability.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
126 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal