Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This proposed study will determine whether a home-based exercise intervention that avoids continuous supervision and exercise-related ischemic pain improves walking performance at 52-week follow-up in people with PAD, compared to an attention control group and compared to a high intensity exercise intervention. In our secondary aims, we will determine whether high intensity exercise improves six-minute walk distance as compared to the attention control group. In secondary aims, we will also determine whether low intensity exercise and high intensity home-based exercise, respectively, improve patient reported outcomes, physical activity, and treadmill walking performance compared to attention control. Our intervention directly addresses two aspects of current practice guidelines that are major barriers to exercise for patients with PAD: 1) the recommendation for supervised exercise and 2) the recommendation for high intensity ischemic-pain inducing walking exercise.
Full description
We will randomize 305 PAD participants to one of three parallel arms: Group 1: Low-intensity, self-paced walking exercise; Group 2: Standard high intensity, ischemic pain-inducing walking exercise; Group 3: Non-exercising attention control group. The low and high intensity exercise groups will attend center-based exercise sessions once per week for four weeks followed by transition to an entirely home-based exercise program for an additional 48 weeks (52 weeks total). Coaches will contact participants weekly by telephone after the first four weeks of the intervention. The low and high intensity exercise interventions will use identical self-regulatory and support strategies. However, the low intensity exercise group will be instructed to exercise with minimal to no ischemic leg discomfort and the high intensity group will be instructed to exercise to maximal ischemic leg pain. These two distinct exercise prescriptions will be reinforced during 48 weeks of home-based exercise, using a well-validated behavioral coaching model that can be delivered by telephone once weekly. Our primary outcome is change in six-minute walk distance at 52-week follow-up. If our hypotheses are correct, millions of people with PAD will benefit from this alternative exercise regimen which will be accessible to most of the 8 million people in the U.S. who suffer from PAD.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
All participants will have PAD. PAD will be defined as follows. First, an ABI < or = 0.90 at the baseline study visit is a well-accepted standard for the diagnosis of PAD and will be an inclusion criterion. Second, people with an ABI of >0.90 and < or = 1.00 who experience a 20% ankle systolic pressure drop after the heel-rise test will also be included. Third, potential participants with an ABI > 0.90 who have vascular lab evidence of PAD or angiographic evidence of PAD who have ischemic symptoms during the six-minute walk and/or treadmill exercise stress test will be eligible. In addition to meeting a criterion for PAD, all participants must be symptomatic, defined by one of the following criteria:; a) ischemic leg symptoms (primarily assessed with the San Diego Claudication Questionnaire); b) report ischemic leg symptoms at the end of the six-minute walk; c) report ischemic leg symptoms at the end of the baseline treadmill stress test; d) walking impairment questionnaire results, e) interview with the potential participant about the presence and nature of leg symptoms during walking activity.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
305 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal