ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Lowering PEEP: Weaning From High PEEP Setting

U

University of Bari

Status

Completed

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Treatments

Other: decrease the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)
Other: mechanical features assessment
Other: shunt assessment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The perfusion of the deeply different areas coexisting in ARDS lung generates two type of venus-admixure : true shunt and shunt effect. Briefly, true shunt and shunt effect are related to non-aerated and poorly-ventilated lung areas perfusion respectively. Practically, it is not possible to quantify the true shunt and the shunt-effect directly, but we can measure the "total-shunt", i.e. the sum of two kind of venus-admixured. As it is known from classical physiology, the effects of FiO2 variations on PaO2 are deeply different depending on the type of venous admixures. In the case of a patient with virtually only true shunt, any FiO2 variation will not modify the PaO2. On the other hand, in a patient with virtually only a shunt effect, increasing the FiO2 the PaO2 will progressively increase. Indeed, ventilating a patient presenting only a shunt effect (without true shunt) with pure oxygen will generate a "normal" P/F ratio. In patients ventilated with high PEEP levels it is difficult to predict based on the P/F ratio the relative amount of true shunt and shunt effect. However, patients presenting a significant shunt effect when ventilated with higher PEEP level would likely have "unstable" poorly aerated lung areas that need PEEP to remain opened. In those patients, a PEEP-weaning protocol based on the P/F ratio could induce significant alveolar de-recruitment and clinical deterioration. On the contrary, patients with less shunt effect would be likely less prone to alveolar de-recruitment and would benefice from PEEP decrease.

Full description

the investigators set up a study to test the hypothesis that patients presenting a significant shunt effect when ventilated with higher PEEP levels could be prone to significant alveolar de-recruitment at the PEEP weaning attempt. To do so, the investigator has to measure the total shunt at higher PEEP level in patients ready to be weaned from the PEEP (according to the Mercat protocol), at three FiO2 levels (i.e. 0,3, 0,6 and 1). The shunt effect is quantified as the difference in total shunt between FiO2 0,3 and .The hypothesis of this study is that the shunt effect could predict alveolar de-recruitment when weaning PEEP.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age major than 18
  • 1-2 days since the beginning of mechanical ventilation
  • Moderate or severe ARDS

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a story of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Patients with asthma
  • Patients with neurological disease
  • Patients with heart disease
  • Patients with cardiopulmonary.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

High positive end-expiratory pressure Ventilation
Other group
Description:
patient ventilated fixing high level of positive end expiratory pressure
Treatment:
Other: mechanical features assessment
Other: shunt assessment
Other: decrease the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)
Low positive end-expiratory pressure Ventilation
Other group
Description:
patient ventilated fixing low level of positive end expiratory pressure
Treatment:
Other: mechanical features assessment
Other: shunt assessment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems