Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The primary purpose of this study evaluate if different messaging impacts response rates to a brief survey (i.e., the simplified eligibility tool) that is designed to estimate pack-year eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). This will help inform the best way to increase response rates to the tool in future intervention studies designed to increase LCS, and expand upon survey methodology in general.
Full description
Despite growing evidence that lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-specific mortality, LCS across the United States is remarkably low. This is due in part to challenges with identifying adults who meet eligibility criteria for lifetime smoking intensity (i.e., 20 pack-years or greater), which is often missing from the electronic medical record. We have developed a simplified eligibility tool that has shown accuracy in estimating pack-years. But given the potential for low response rates, there is a great need to identify effective strategies to increasing response rates equitably prior to using it in practice or in future studies. The primary purpose of this study evaluate if different messaging impacts response rates to a brief survey (i.e., the simplified eligibility tool) that is designed to estimate pack-year eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). This will help to identify the best way to increase response rates to the tool in future intervention studies designed to increase LCS, and expand upon survey methodology in general.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
6,125 participants in 12 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal